posted 04-30-2002 12:15 AM            

Ahh yes, that has to be my favorite picture. What they didn't tell you is this was swiped from USAF archives and the fighter jets trailing it on vortex research were conveniently cropped out. And what's a "NAVY" plane (as it says in the photo caption) doing with a USAF Roundel emblem? If you're going to fake conspiracies, at least be accurate in the details please.

Yes folks, they really do vortex research:

BTW, that photo was taken in 1974. I've seen contrails in the skies since I was young enough to remember, and I knew what they were then too.

posted 04-30-2002 01:02 AM               

Please welcome the latest debunker to the list.

posted 04-30-2002 01:17 AM            

I was told that first pic http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/1059-img.jpg was a fake or at the very least enhanced...

I mean please...look at the under belly of both craft....the first one is a bit *clean* is it not ?

posted 04-30-2002 03:44 AM            

Sure, why not? This could well be a picture of a fuel dump. But, there are sooo many other pictures and eyewitness accounts out there on this forum.

true but that 1st photos bunk...too clean...

My personal opinion is that there is some weather modification research/action going on. The potential science is there; the eyewitness accounts and photos are there from many people.

yes small scale wx-mod, but when done by a country is supposed to be a no...no... (planned and inadvertant weather mod)...don't have the link handy...

the east coast is suffering a drought for the momment, but colorado has had one for 5 years running....if the assumption is correct, they better start getting it right because what ever's supposedly being done is not working...

The planes I have seen don't have exhaust spouts like this; their lingering chemtrails come right from the engines. No, we can't prove this for sure, yet, but that does not mean that the chemtrails do not exist. I'm open-minded either way. Any analytical information is welcome. For example, I agreed recently with Duncan that a recent test report of barium in rainwater was inconclusive. That does not mean I don't believe in the possibility of chemtrails.

your open mind is a credit to you...the telescope I have is too sensitive to view planes, oh shit did you say you agreed with dunk ??? that cigar somking salsa eating debunker !! ack !

but seriously, maybe most of this and that is there in the air because it's supposed to be...the explosion of allergen's in the last 5 years says alot...I'm certainly not a green, more of a wallflower of rapid climate change protagonists...with the influence being on good ole' mother earth doing what she does...

baxter has a point on the volcano example...

One of the biggest fallacies of our time is coming to conclusions based upon incomplete information. Politicians, commentators, and media use it all the time. Any genuine conclusion either way must take into account all angles. I've not seen that yet for chemtrails either way.

and I could not have put that better...even if I was on crack....

posted 04-30-2002 10:33 AM               

One debunker says "This is a NAVY plane doing a FUEL DUMP!".

Another debunker says "This is a USAF plane doing a VORTEX TEST!".

Get your stories straight Sgt. Crackster.