|
Author
|
|
Topic: What is this all about? | Topic page views:
|
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 06-29-2002 11:30 PM
I think this is what Krissa was talking about hooligan. October 1996 May 1998 June 1998 Sept 1999 http://ovnis.esoterica.pt/princip/SOHO/soho.htm 
|
hooligan
Senior Member
Seattle 76 posts, Feb 2002
|
posted 06-30-2002 01:18 AM
Thanks for that link Dan. Yep, there has been stuff up there for years. This one seems closer. So much detail. Now I feel better actually.Probably are not interested in old earth.
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 06-30-2002 01:29 AM
They seem to be more interested in the sun than anything else and probably wont bother us. 
|
LWR
Cognitive Dissonance
Menlo Park, Ca, USA 224 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 06-30-2002 06:54 PM
Some more great links from Big Daddy: Here's three more. All of them U.S. Navy... West Coast and East Pacific http://kauai.nrlmry.navy.mil/sat-bin/epac_westcoast.cgi US Main http://kauai.nrlmry.navy.mil/sat-bin/conus.cgi Tropical (Atlantic, East Pacific, and the other side of the world) http://kauai.nrlmry.navy.mil/sat-bin/tropics.cgi Secondary click-offs from these links will allow you to do a number of things... IR, Visible, and even animate if you've got a fast connection. BD

|
David
Chemtrail Information Agent
1245 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 07-01-2002 07:10 AM
Holligan, I tried to find out more on the video but could not find much. It was titled "UFO's,the best evidence yet". Aired three nights ago on direct tv. If I can locate more I'll let ya know.

|
amber
UK ENVOY

uk 445 posts, May 2001
|
posted 07-02-2002 03:56 AM
Have a look at this one: http://members.aol.com/phikent/orbit/9-22egadzyy.jpg 
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 07-02-2002 04:17 AM
 Image is low resolution and possibly could have been doctored. If this picture is by chance authentic, It's apparent that our star sun is being interfered with by some outside force. It appears to be some kind of magnetic beam, a very, very large beam at that. I am somewhat skeptical of this one... I hope this is not real.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Alpha-Theta on 07-02-2002]

|
amber
UK ENVOY

uk 445 posts, May 2001
|
posted 07-02-2002 08:12 AM
It is real...it is from the same site as the others! Here's another http://members.aol.com/phikent/orbit/12-23c3sm.jpg]
[Edited 3 times, lastly by amber on 07-02-2002] 
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly

right here 2440 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 07-02-2002 10:44 AM
Concerning the above pic posted by A/T ~ quote: The three images above can no longer be found on either the NASA or Navy websites where we took them from. The only thing you can find now are images just before and just after. But not the time and date of the above. There's an MPEG movie file for this date. But, the frames for the time of 17:42...the time this photo was taken...is MISSING! Interesting, to say the least. What's going on guys? Why did you take them down? Is this something we weren't supposed to see?
http://skywatch.iwarp.com/sun/ It is a weird one alright! 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 07-02-2002 01:12 PM
That's a really big beam. November 21 1998 And this is a really big looking thing. I just like the caption below the picture too. quote: Questionados sobre as fotos, técnicos da ESA Agência Espacial Europeia, apressaram-se a explicar que as fotos obtidas estavam "defeituosas" por uma "exposição excessiva" !!!Insistindo em obter uma explicação mais plausível, o telefone foi desligado.
Rough Portuguese/Spanish to English Translation: Questioned about the pictures, technicians from the THAT Spatial Agency Europeia, they rushed themselves it explain that the pictures obtained were "defective" by an "excessive exposition"!! Insisting on obtain a more more plausible explanation, the telephone was turned off. BTW, those ships were still buzzing around the sun as of May of 2002 and are probably still there.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Dan Rockwell on 07-02-2002]

|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 07-02-2002 01:52 PM
If this beam pic is real, which it appears to be after seeing the black/white version, it backs the testimony of Al Bielek. He has been saying for years that the Orion's have been antagonizing and aggravating our sun, ultimately in attempt to negate the energies of our solar system. Anyone familiar with Al should know what I am referring to. If not do a little research on Al Bielek and his claims. They don't seem so far fetched after viewing these pictures. 4th Density = 4th Dimension = Photon Belt = Orion Manipulation It all started one beautiful day in Lemuria Once such evils are abolished eternity will truly be ours I wonder if they sell milky way bars on other planets in our system?
[Edited 8 times, lastly by Alpha-Theta on 07-03-2002] 
|
amber
UK ENVOY

uk 445 posts, May 2001
|
posted 07-02-2002 03:45 PM
Right angles?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Dan Rockwell on 07-02-2002] 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 07-02-2002 04:43 PM
That is really a weird one amber.I did a little research concerning the objects that are buzzing around the sun and they are called Sun Cruisers and were mentioned by Peter Gerstain a few years ago. quote: NASA's EXPLANATION>From the information I've read and been told, NASA's SOHO team hasprovided an unsatisfactory answer to the "Sun Cruiser" mystery. If I understand correctly, the SOHO team claims that the "Sun Cruisers" are the result of pinhole damage created in the camera filters by space debris that are revealed to the camera when a strong light source from a planet (like Venus, Mars, Jupiter, etc.) aligns with the hole to create the spectacular effect with the horizontal line and making the planet appear larger than it really is. At least that is how I understand their explanation. There are, however, problems with this answer. The "cruisers" move around quickly and erratically in movement that does not match the orbit of those planets. One source tells me that the software program "Redshift" shows that the planetary movements don't match the movements of the phenomenon. So much for NASA's answer.
http://soulinvitation.com/america/suncruisers.html More information can be found here as well as more pictures of them.
Project Stargate II - The Sun Cruiser http://www.wolflodge.org/stargate/suncruiser/sc.htm

|
penumbra
quarky

North Carolina 667 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 07-03-2002 08:05 AM
Here's another from Cyberspaceorbit... 
|
hooligan
Senior Member
Seattle 76 posts, Feb 2002
|
posted 07-03-2002 12:07 PM
I sent the picture, you can see earlier in this thread, to cyberspace.(the pic with 3-D looking objects) I sent it to Kent first 'cos I thought he'd want it.I asked if he could enlarge the objects because I didn't have the software to do it well. He emailed me back and said "enlarge what?" I sent it again because I thought he must have looked at the wrong pic but he never posted the image. All the other strange sun pictures are posted. He must think it is just a glitch, but couldn't everything be a glitch? I thought he posted anything anomalous and did not make judgements. Anyway I thought it strange, it seemed just the image for cyberspace. You can see "sun cruisers" often if you look. You can find strange stuff often if you look. But I haven't seen anything else like those objects. 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 07-03-2002 03:39 PM
The objects weren't there at the same time on he 27th. But they're definitely there on the 28th http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/summary/gif/020628/seit_00195_fd_20020628_2324.gif
There's two objects in this image that was taken at 2324 UTC on the 28th almost 24 hours later. 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 07-14-2002 08:08 PM
hooligan found another interesting image and told me about it and so I'm gonna put it right here. 
|