|
Author
|
|
Topic: HUNT THE BOEING | Topic page views:
|
|
emfx13
Senior Member
Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
668 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-01-2002 01:48 PM
    
As everyone knows, on 11 September, less than an hour after the attack on the World Trade Centre, an airplane collided with the Pentagon. The Associated Press first reported that a booby-trapped truck had caused the explosion. The Pentagon quickly denied this. The official US government version of events still holds. Here's a little game for you: Take a look at these photographs and try to find evidence to corroborate the official version. It's up to you to Hunt the Boeing!
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Dan Rockwell on 08-04-2002] 
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior
ª×µ»ƒ³²²
694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-01-2002 02:08 PM
Hyperlink
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!
Stamford, CT, USA
1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 08-01-2002 02:37 PM
I'm pretty sure that we already found the Boeing emfx. One suspicion that my girlfriend raised, however, was if the Boeing was the only thing to hit the Pentagon that day.
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000372.html
|
KnewEyes
watcher
under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 08-02-2002 10:25 AM
Well, I wouldn't bet the farm on it. As far as I'm concerned those pieces of metal on the ground do not prove a boeing hit the pentagon.
I thought it was supposed to be a plane crash, you know,, where a plane falls out of the sky, approaching from above. The pictures of the pentagon getting hit, clearly show a vehicle of some sort, approaching horizontally, from ground level. I don't see any wings on it either. http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/77comments.html Also.. why would a "mock" aircrash into the pentagon be staged just one year before this event happened, with little models of passenger planes, hitting little models of pentagons. Why such a thorough study on that particular type of event? Maybe they figured out from their pre-planning with their faux-plane, and faux-pentagon, that hitting the pentagon with a plane, would create more damage than "necessary".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Washington, D.C., Nov. 3, 2000 — The fire and smoke from the downed passenger aircraft billows from the Pentagon courtyard. Defense Protective Services Police seal the crash sight. Army medics, nurses and doctors scramble to organize aid. An Arlington Fire Department chief dispatches his equipment to the affected areas. Don Abbott, of Command Emergency Response Training, walks over to the Pentagon and extinguishes the flames. The Pentagon was a model and the "plane crash" was a simulated one..... http://mdwweb.mdw.army.mil/news/Contingency_Planning.html
[Edited 1 times, lastly by KnewEyes on 08-02-2002]
|
David
Chemtrail Information Agent
1245 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 08-02-2002 11:02 AM
I agree with you kneweyes, nothing is conclusive in this issue, the mystery only deepens.emfx13--check this site, Mega, a lot of good information and video on the Pentagon vs plane or missile? Here is the link, follow the thread, it gets very interesting... http://chem11.proboards2.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=Discussion&num=101532 6050&start=0
[Edited 2 times, lastly by David on 08-02-2002]
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior
ª×µ»ƒ³²²
694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-03-2002 09:33 PM
Nothing is certainly conclusive. It doesn't exactly look to be a projectile or a descending boeing. What it is exactly I can't discern. It's definitely something and it looks like it's either moving on the ground or parallel to the ground within close proximity of it. If you look at the video of this it shows this object (circled) impact the pentagon at what looks like a very high speed. (video is at link Dan posted above) 
[Edited 3 times, lastly by Alpha-Theta on 08-03-2002]
|
emfx13
Senior Member
Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
668 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-03-2002 09:54 PM
It look's like something was "driven"in to the pentagon to me.http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior
ª×µ»ƒ³²²
694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-03-2002 10:18 PM
emfx u never hyperlink!! 
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Alpha-Theta on 08-03-2002]
|
emfx13
Senior Member
Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
668 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-03-2002 10:25 PM
Sorry,i really don,t know how?
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior
ª×µ»ƒ³²²
694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-03-2002 10:28 PM
lol no sweat... I was just jokin' around anyway.  Normally when you type a url it should hyperlink itself. It may be since you didn't space the url.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Alpha-Theta on 08-03-2002]
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!
Stamford, CT, USA
1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 08-04-2002 12:43 AM
I fixed the link emfx. It should work now.Alpha, the white thing that is circled is a trail. The black thing is just part of the background according to my girlfriend who spent hours looking at each of the 5 frames using Microsoft Gif Animator. The jet , or whatever it was, is right on top of that rectangular stone column. It's tailfin is just to the left of and almost touching the edge of the circle. The black thing that is circled only appears to disappear, as the frames but it is just partially covered by the smoke from the trail. Watch the frames closely by focusing on the object on top of the column and you'll see it move.  The only thing that I really can't be sure about is whether of not the trail is coming from the object or something else that is on an intercept course with it such as a missile of some kind.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Dan Rockwell on 08-04-2002]
|
KnewEyes
watcher
under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 08-04-2002 08:19 AM
That trail looks like it has a set of wheels. I see the fin above the column you are talking about Dan, but it looks like its the front part of that white vehicle pushing it out of a parking lot. It looks sort of like a combo small jet/minivan to me.
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!
Stamford, CT, USA
1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 08-04-2002 10:33 AM
It's really hard to tell KnewEyes. The one thing that does look a little odd is what appears to be the tail section moving closer to the camera in frame 5 as if whatever it was, was pushed sideways. My girlfriend thought she noticed what appeared to be wheels that are visible in frame 2 and 5 but it's really hard to tell what they are with the limited amoount of frames. It's very possible that there was an attempt to intercept the jet? before it struck the Pentagon and that would explain some of the inconsistancies with the impact damage that were pointed out by the French. I just wish that they would have given us a few more frames to play with. If that object in frame 5 is the tail, I wonder where it ended up. It looks almost completely intact to me and not where it should be if it just simply struck the Pentagon.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Dan Rockwell on 08-04-2002]
|
GAS_MASK
Open-Minded
151 posts, Jul 2002
|
posted 08-04-2002 06:23 PM
Well, whatever it is, it sure doesn't look like a 757.  Perhaps it is a slightly different Boeing product....hmmm?
[Edited 3 times, lastly by GAS_MASK on 08-04-2002]
|
emfx13
Senior Member
Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
668 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-04-2002 06:25 PM
Video with audio http://www.msnbc.com/news/720851.asp?cp1=1 Here's a site with alot of picture's. http://www.thepowerhour.com/pentgallery/FrameSet.htm
[Edited 2 times, lastly by emfx13 on 08-04-2002]
|
phil jayhan
New Member
5 posts, Aug 2002
|
posted 08-04-2002 09:22 PM
 more pics @ http://pub83.ezboard.com/fcorpustforumsfrm11 Give me your poor, your huddled masses yearning to be free,
the wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the Golden Door and make a Spy of thee~ Hmmmm,
phil jayhan
ps: hey Dan, nice video!  Visit our Main Site @ Corpus T
http://www.corpust.com
[Edited 2 times, lastly by phil jayhan on 08-04-2002]
|
KrissaTMC2
Never Surrender!
Greenwich, CT, USA
472 posts, Feb 2002
|
posted 08-04-2002 10:09 PM
Wecome Phil. Cool Site and those Dr. Evil Bush & Mini Cheney Pictures are funny. Dan, I've looked at that video too and I have to agree with Gas_Mask that it doesn't look like a 757 but it could be. I do see what appears to be a tail in frame 5 too and what does look like wheels but I have to wonder why they only chose to show the 5 frames. They could very well be trying to hide something.
|
emfx13
Senior Member
Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
668 posts, May 2002
|
posted 08-04-2002 10:45 PM
{WELCOME PHIL} THE SECRET HISTORY/9-11 TIMELINE http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020812/timeline/
[Edited 1 times, lastly by emfx13 on 08-04-2002]
|
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
