Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
Who's Linking
What's Popular
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote

  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Other Trails
  It's The End Of The World -- Anyone Want To Cover It?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   It's The End Of The World -- Anyone Want To Cover It?

Topic page views:

herbivore
Along for the ride


New Mexico
105 posts, Jan 2002

posted 09-02-2002 03:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for herbivore     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hope everyone is enjoying Labor Day. While slaving over a hot computer, I ran across a piece from the San Francisco Chronicle slamming the news media. A ray of hope through the massive darkness of major snooze copy. Selected remarks follow, which are in turn followed by the whole article.

It's as if we Americans are engaged in a massive conspiracy of silence.
...
Our leaders lead us not only into temptation but also into perdition.
...
Would it be going too far to say the news media panders?

HA! Would it, indeed.

The summer of 2002 has been a mighty loud wake-up call. God help us if we continue to snooze through it.

"Do not go gentle into that good night....
Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
Dylan Thomas

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/09/02/hs orensen.DTL&type=printable

Harley Sorensen, Special to SF Gate
Monday, September 2, 2002
©2002 SF Gate

quote:
Today is Labor Day, a day set aside to honor working people and give them a day off. So why am I working today?

Labor Day marks the unofficial end of summer. The summer of '02 may go down in the short remaining history of the world as the first summer that global warming intruded upon the masses, though most of us pretend not to notice.

Oh, we noticed the floods and droughts and heat records nearly everywhere, but we treated each extreme as if it stood by itself.

It's as if we Americans are engaged in a massive conspiracy of silence. Like Scarlett, we'll worry about the end of the world tomorrow.

Our leaders lead us not only into temptation but also into perdition. Our president, George W. Bush, was notably absent last week from the United Nations Summit on Sustainable Development in South Africa.

The leaders of about 100 nations were there, struggling to find a way to limit our damage to Mother Earth. Bush, the leader of the greatest consumer nation in the world, couldn't be bothered to attend. He was too busy playing cowboy on his make-believe "ranch" near Crawford, Texas.

On television last week, the big news stories were the threat of a baseball strike, the sentencing of a wealthy ne'er-do-well for a murder he committed 27 years ago (they interrupted regular broadcasting for that scoop!) and latest details on the kid snatching du jour.

I don't mean to minimize the importance of a missing or murdered child, but such events get great coverage on TV these days not because of their importance but because of their emotional appeal.

Would it be going too far to say the news media panders?

There are many lamentations these days, much weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth, over corporate ownership of news outlets, but (stop the presses!) I've got news for you: It ain't no worse than it's always been.

People who own newspapers, radio stations and television stations do so for one reason: to make money. That's the way it is now, and that's the way it's always been.

The principles these owners adhere to are economic principles. Journalistic ethics, service to the community, exercise of the First Amendment -- all these things are secondary to the profit motive.

And profits are made through the sale of advertising. Without advertising, we would see very few newspapers and very few TV stations, and we'd hear very little radio.

When it comes to the media, money is king.

Even the Internet, open and raucous as it is, is not pristine. Almost everyone who posts news or opinion on the Net dreams of the day he or she will be successful enough to sell advertising and make enough money to retire to some exotic paradise -- like San Francisco, for instance.

I've been disillusioned by the press twice in my life. (Normal people would have learned the first time.) That first disillusionment was more than 40 years ago. In 1959 I bought a small-town newspaper and was excited at the prospect of rubbing elbows with other small-town journalists, those cranky old guys and energetic young ones who tell it like it is and don't back down from anybody.

Ha! I met a lot of small-town publishers, but not a one of them was a journalist first and a businessman second. They were ad salesman who had bought the shop, or country printers or young folks who had inherited the business, and so forth. Not a journalist in the lot that I met.

My second disillusionment came here in San Francisco, about 15 years ago, when I was a daytime cab driver. There was a convention of CBS-affiliate owners meeting at the Fairmont, so I hung around the hotel that week hoping to meet some real journalists.

Ha, again! I did meet a few TV performers (none of whom I recognized, even after they told me who they were), but the owners I met had the unmistakable odor of car salesmen about them.

And that's what they were: salesmen. They bought and sold stations for one purpose only: to make money. CBS's revered journalistic icons -- Edward R. Morrow, Eric Sevareid, Walter Cronkite -- were mere moneymaking tools to them.

Most people get their news these days from television, which pretty much explains why we Americans are so poorly informed. Thanks in part to cable, TV has a problem: too many stations. With all that competition, the quest for dollars becomes more and more fierce.

That is why, in my opinion, we see so many compelling emotional stories on TV these days, and so little news of importance to Americans. There is so much competition among broadcasters to get our attention that the programming gets more and more outrageous all the time. I'm convinced that TV outlets would show snuff films if they thought they could get away with it.

News broadcasts are called news "shows," and for good reason. Listen to the music; look at the graphics. The color, the action, the sound -- it's all designed to draw us in, like the lights and sounds in a casino.

We are so conditioned to this show-biz approach that a straight news broadcast, such as one might see on public television, seems tedious to us.

Unfortunately for us, character is not considered as important as money these days, so it's unlikely that many in control of the news business will ever again try to give us the news we need to know. What tugs at our heartstrings, what scares us, what fills us with wonder -- those are the things we'll continue to see and hear and read as our planet spins through space, getting hotter and hotter by the minute, because we aren't interested.

I'm not seriously predicting the end of human life on Planet Earth -- not yet. But the wake-up calls are out there. They're faint, but they exist between the revelations of the latest theory on the Jon-Benet Ramsey murder and the sexual escapades of soon-to-be ex-congressman turned pensioner Gary Condit.

The summer of 2002 has been a mighty loud wake-up call. God help us if we continue to snooze through it.

Harley Sorensen is a longtime journalist and iconoclast. His column appears Mondays. E-mail him at harleysorensen@yahoo.com.




[Edited 5 times, lastly by herbivore on 09-02-2002]

IP Logged

Molliani
Senior Member

Illinois
346 posts, Mar 2001

posted 09-03-2002 02:03 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Molliani     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I for one am glad our president was absent from the Summit.

quote:
[Our leaders lead us not only into temptation but also into perdition. Our president, George W. Bush, was notably absent last week from the United Nations Summit on Sustainable Development in South Africa.

The leaders of about 100 nations were there, struggling to find a way to limit our damage to Mother Earth. Bush, the leader of the greatest consumer nation in the world, couldn't be bothered to attend. He was too busy playing cowboy on his make-believe "ranch" near Crawford, Texas.]
..........................................................................
http://www.townhall.com/news/

Earth Summit Participants Fail to Support Pollution 'Offset' Fund

Johannesburg (CNSNews.com) - In what may be yet another example of hypocrisy by the delegates to the Earth Summit, the voluntary trust fund supported by the United Nations to help offset pollution generated by the event, has only raised a fraction of its goal of $2.9 million from summit participants.

One critic of the environmental movement called the summit participants "hypocrites for failing to follow through on their own [anti-pollution] rhetoric."

The "Johannesburg Climate Legacy Project," (http://www.climatelegacy.org/) a trust fund designed to alleviate the Earth Summit delegates concern about the pollution they generate through their airline flights, ground transportation and hotel waste, has only raised $300,000 as of August 31, well short of the $2.9 million goal, according to All Africa Global Media (allAfrica.com).

Only about one in five delegates have bothered to donate any money and receive a "signed commemorative certificate." In addition, only seven governments have signed up for the project's certificates.

Despite being urged to donate so they could "make one of the most important commitments in modern history to a sustainable future," summit participants have thus far kept their wallets closed.

The delegates, environmental groups, government officials and the media are projected to generate the same amount of pollution during the ten days of the United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development as nearly half a million Africans do during the course of an entire year, according to the British group United Forests, one of the sponsors of the fund.

'Everyone Can Take Part'

The trust fund is designed to raise money from summit participants to "offset" the estimated 300,000 tons of CO2 produced by the event, by investing in non fossile fuel "energy efficient carbon-reducing sustainable projects across South Africa." The trust fund calls itself "a straightforward but powerful way in which everyone can take part."

The web site helps all attendees of the summit to calculate (http://www.climatelegacy.org/calculate/index.asp) their estimated pollution contribution and then urges them to make a donation to the trust fund to offset it.

'Bought More Lobster and Caviar'

"The delegates are hypocrites for failing to follow through on their own rhetoric," Ron Arnold told CNSNews.com. Arnold is vice president of the Center for Defense of Free Enterprise, an environmental watchdog group.

"This fund is nothing more than a guilt fund, it is just hypocrisy," Arnold said.

"They are not going to do anything with the trust fund money anyway, it would have just bought more caviar and lobster," Arnold added. He was referring to news reports last week detailing how delegates to the summit are staying at posh hotels and feasting on gourmet foods while they hold meetings on eradicating poverty and famine.

Arnold said the summit participants were guilty of the "pollution of hot air" for their approach to economic growth. Arnold believes the summit's sustainable development agenda of economic restrictions will result in "the first world reducing itself to the level of the third world and the third world staying in perpetual poverty."

Arnold understands the summit participants' reluctance to give to the trust fund.

"Environmental groups are the most inefficient projects in the world, they don't produce anything, they just stop other people from producing," he said.
..........................................................................

quote:
[On television last week, the big news stories were the threat of a baseball strike]

I like baseball and I really enjoy listening to Pat and Ron broadcast the Cub games
whether it's in my car, at work or at home.
They're funny and it's therapeutic.


IP Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c