|
Author
|
|
Topic: Web of Deceit - Internet Professionals? | Topic page views:
|
|
Mech
Commitees of Correspondence

The Minuteman State 5968 posts, Jun 2001
|
posted 06-28-2003 10:00 AM
Exellent post Eggs.It was the the Torries (conservatives) that supported the King and fuedalism...much like it is today. They also supported thinks like slavery,were against womens rights,workers rights, civil rights...you name it. All for $ and power. I say...... this describes the BU$H mob perfectly..... "--A while back, a gaggle of Trotskyite Communists and other totalitarians began the process of stealing the label "conservative." They began to call themselves "neo-conservatives," or "neo-cons" for short. They didnīt change what they were, just what they were called. They still wanted the government to run everything, as in Mother Russia. Typically, their purpose was to drive the true conservatives out of conservatism as they had driven them out of true liberalism; their purpose was to make liberty lovers homeless and ineffectual again. So, they began to say that if you donīt believe what they believe - if you arenīt a "neo-conservative" - you arenīt a conservative at all; youīre disloyal. Or.."you are either with us, or with the terrorists".. A "neo-conservative" is an advocate of totalitarian world government.--"
[Edited 4 times, lastly by Mech on 06-29-2003] 
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 06-29-2003 08:09 PM
Hear! HEAR!About time some truth leakes past he conservative filters: this describes the BU$H mob perfectly..... "--A while back, a gaggle of Trotskyite Communists and other totalitarians began the process of stealing the label "conservative." They began to call themselves "neo-conservatives," or "neo-cons" for short. They didnīt change what they were, just what they were called. They still wanted the government to run everything, as in Mother Russia. Typically, their purpose was to drive the true conservatives out of conservatism as they had driven them out of true liberalism; their purpose was to make liberty lovers homeless and ineffectual again. So, they began to say that if you donīt believe what they believe - if you arenīt a "neo-conservative" - you arenīt a conservative at all; youīre disloyal. Or.."you are either with us, or with the terrorists".. A "neo-conservative" is an advocate of totalitarian world government.--" the "terrorists" are the RNC who orchestrated amerika's riechstag Fire to suit their own unholy goals and demonic dreams.
all history will show I'm right and they, are merely "rightwing" Liars and Quislings all. 
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 06-29-2003 09:11 PM
They still wanted the government to run everything, as in Mother Russia.
hell you socialist pig that's what you want ?!?!?!?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by theseeker on 06-30-2003] 
|
Mech
Commitees of Correspondence

The Minuteman State 5968 posts, Jun 2001
|
posted 06-30-2003 02:30 AM
Nope..it's what th NEO-CONS (Bu$h admin) wants. (and coincidentally getting).They are the biggest Trotskyite Socialists America has ever seen. 
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 06-30-2003 02:47 AM
it ain't either...and I was referring to shitoga as the "socialist pig" you are not that... 
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-02-2003 06:05 PM
Unter den Lyndon?First time he has ever made any sense: "The DLC simply represents that Republican right wing {inside} the Democratic Party. Their sole purpose is to wreck the Democratic Party and to guarantee George W. Bush's re-election." ----In context below--- >In a sharply worded statement, Freeman said that highly placed Washington, D.C. sources had indicated that major money interests associated with organized-crime figures, including Democratic Leadership Council founder Mickey Steinhardt, had put out the word that LaRouche was to be kept out of all Democratic Party functions and activity related to the Presidential campaign, no matter what the consequences. The same sources indicated that representatives of the Democratic National Committee had made clear to the other Democratic hopefuls that any candidate who chose to recognize LaRouche's candidacy would be "iced out" of any Democratic Party-sponsored activity and financing. "At this point, it would appear that the only stated purpose the DNC has in this campaign so far is to lock Lyndon LaRouche out, and deny Democratic voters access to the only candidate who is prepared to address issues of immediate concern to them." Freeman noted that LaRouche has demonstrated a greater depth of active support than any of the other candidates, and referred to "recent FEC filings which indicate that LaRouche leads all Democratic candidates in contributions from individuals." Freeman said, "At this point, the nine other candidates seem willing to capitulate to this pressure from dirty money interests. If nothing else, that capitulation marks them as entirely not qualified to serve in the office of the Presidency." Freeman said that, although the source of the pressure would appear to emanate from the DLC, a group most closely associated with the candidacy of Joe Lieberman, in fact, the actual source of the pressure comes from the far right wing of the Republican Party. "The DLC simply represents that Republican right wing {inside} the Democratic Party. Their sole purpose is to wreck the Democratic Party and to guarantee George W. Bush's re-election." < source: http://larouchein2004.net/pages/speeches/2003/030702webcast.htm 
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-02-2003 06:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by theseeker: it ain't either...and I was referring to shitoga as the "socialist pig" you are not that...
Can't be a socialist $eeker.I support private property rights, and oppose the "Socialism in practice" of the Military industrial complex. sign over title to your house and car to the government. I worked both harder and smarter for everything I've got.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by shatoga on 07-02-2003]

|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 07-02-2003 07:02 PM
how about the corporate pigs clinton and rubin let loose on the retirement accounts of American workers shitoga...go back to sleep.... 
|
Fastwalker
Senior Member
832 posts, Mar 2003
|
posted 07-02-2003 08:59 PM
 I have a better idea...Shoot the clueless liberal bitch holding the sign. 
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-04-2003 03:24 PM
The first post in this topic applies here more than ever before to show the motivesVisit those links and either believe the truth or sign up with the RNC as a team leader. (and give orders to $eeker and FW!) $eeker means those ENRON execs (buddies of the 'son-of-a-bush) who bought the election for his dear dubya. posted 07-02-2003 07:02 PM: >the corporate pigs.....let loose on the retirement accounts of American workers <
It was Reagan who increased payroll deductions while cutting benefits eg: raised the retirement age FW As always wants to use criminal violence to supress freedom of speech.(like any good little national socialist) posted 07-02-2003 08:59 PM: >shoot the *...holding the sign.< The only people opposed to freedom of speech are those whose beliefs are based on total nonsense. Anyone allowed to hear all sides will reject such cults. Only by suppressing free speech can cults keep deluded followers ignorant of the truth. (and therefore loyal)

|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 07-04-2003 07:04 PM
does anyone understand what letting corps. run wild has to do with reagan and social security ?but if shitoga wants to loose another argument to me... where does it say that the founding fathers favor government sponsored social security in the constitution ? 
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-04-2003 08:40 PM
Rightwing corporate pigs at ENRON used employees retirement account monies to inflate values of stocks while they plundered the funds in those retirement accounts. quote: Originally posted by $eeker: how about the corporate pigs clinton and rubin let loose on the retirement accounts of American workers...
Your comment about Clinton and retirement accounts was what was being replied to. (braindead never understands until one of it's own cult tells it what to think!) Don't you national socialists even read your own posts/lies? You would seem a tiny bit less stupid if you would read your own posts before posting idiotic comments to those who respond (on topic) directly to your posts. Or is it really just choose A B or C canned response as your RNC/Bivings team leader directs? Seems that is so. We poor Liberals/Moderates/Progressives/Lbertarians have to think for ourselves. It must be so easy for those of you conservatives who have surrendered your thought processes to the cult leaders. Just parrot the nonsense they dish out in your trough.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by shatoga on 07-04-2003]

|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 07-04-2003 08:48 PM
you never respond to topic, discussion is a foreign word to ya...you and larry just push your hatefilled agenda...fact 
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-04-2003 09:17 PM
Was that canned reply A B C or D? quote: Originally posted by theseeker: you never respond to topic, discussion is a foreign word to ya...you and larry just push your hatefilled agenda...fact
We poor Liberals/Moderates/Progressives/Lbertarians have to think for ourselves. It must be so easy for those of you conservatives who have surrendered your thought processes to the cult leaders. Just parrot the nonsense they dish out in your trough. As always: Thanks for bumping this topic $eeker buddy. Aren't you worried your team leader will get wise. Oh yeah! If he was smart he would be on my side already! OK buddy! gotcha! Thanks for bumping this topic $eeker.

|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-23-2003 08:18 PM
Truth about the motives and funding of Bush minions should not die in the archives! Faggy $eeker and FW earn a living by arguing for their dimigod Bush in all forums and all topics?
Not likely! someone must have evidence that at least `once they have opposed the 4th Reich. anyone? Please come forward. Rescue these posters from being branded Minions of the son=of-a-Bush. Anyone? Prove they are not just dittoes of whatever Rush tells them to think and say daily. Anyone? Is freedom of speech still allowed in bushylvania?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by shatoga on 07-23-2003] 
|
Fastwalker
Senior Member
832 posts, Mar 2003
|
posted 07-23-2003 09:56 PM
Hey Shitoga. This is how your party thinks. Caught on tape.... Tuesday, July 22, 2003 Democrats Caught Plotting to Worsen California's Budget Crisis
You know the Democrats have done something awful when even the leftist Los Angeles Times breaks ranks and exposes them. "In a meeting they thought was private but was actually broadcast around the Capitol on Monday, 11 Assembly Democrats debated prolonging California's budget crisis to further their political goals." Members of Democratic Study Group, which has pushed to confiscate billions more dollars from taxpayers, failed to note that a microphone in a committee room in the state Capitol was on as they schemed about using the Dems' favorite tactic, obstructionism, to pressure Republicans into accepting the Dems' favorite non-solution, tax increases, to fix Gov. Gray Davis' $38 billion budget deficit. "The conversation was transmitted to roughly 500 'squawk boxes' around Sacramento that political staff, lobbyists and reporters use to listen in on legislative proceedings," the Times reported today. Leftist Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg of Los Angeles said: "Since this is going to be a crisis, the crisis could be this year. No one's running [for re-election]. And maybe you end up better off than you would have, and maybe you don't. But what you do is you show people that you can't get to this without a 55 percent vote." The state Constitution requires a two-thirds majority of the Legislature to approve any tax increase, but the ballot initiative would let the Legislature sock taxpayers with a vote by only 55 percent of legislators. Assemblyman Fabian Nunez, also of L.A., agreed. "If you don't have a budget, it helps Democrats," he said. Democrats to the Poor: Drop Dead! The Times admitted, "While a delay might serve the tactical advantage of Democrats, its consequences are already being felt by students, vendors and the poor: Since the new fiscal year began July 1 without a budget, the state has already begun to cut off money to some programs." Assembly Budget Committee Vice Chairman John Campbell, R-Irvine, listened to about 20 minutes of the meeting on the squawk box in his office. "It sounded like they were hoping to create a crisis at some point to further their political gains in other areas," he said. "I thought that was outrageous." He said that the Democrats talked about exploiting the public's distaste for the (Democrat-run) Legislature. "They were worried that if the Legislature appeared to have dealt with the budget crisis, the initiative may not play well," he said. "This is very surprising, considering they are in charge." "Their intention is to destroy the state of California and its financial base," said Assembly Minority Leader Dave Cox of Fair Oaks. "They intend to hold up the budget." After an hour and a half, a staff member finally told the dimwitted Democrats that their meeting was being broadcast. "Oh [expletive], [expletive]," Goldberg said. "The squawk box is on," the underling said. "You need to turn it off right there." "How could that happen?" Goldberg said. She later refused to apologize even after being caught red-handed and with foot in mouth. "We're in a crisis. You don't have to precipitate one. The question is whether we should make that crisis happen now when it's really happening," was the best Goldberg could offer. "When you wait a year, you double the amount you have to cut. Is it better to do it now or next year?"

|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-23-2003 10:23 PM
'thanks FW, as always.bumping the topic that proves your reason for posting. It is always a risk. My gratitude! That some conservatives are not wholly soulless is gratifying! Post insults and innuendo to balance. that your dark lord may forgive the abberation and let you continue to serve the darkside.

|
Fastwalker
Senior Member
832 posts, Mar 2003
|
posted 07-23-2003 10:52 PM
Read the article Shat...I don't think you'll find any insults there, just an accounting of what actually took place and has been widely reported. This is just another example of the party you serve.
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-23-2003 11:31 PM
Thanks FW for serving truth instead of the parody you usually serve.Bumping this topic is supporting God's honest truth! Hating me, and all others who distrust both sides and seek the truth is a given. Would only that truth mattered also to the rightwing bush loyalists. Of course, if truth matterd, you would be no longer loyal to Bush. stupid US.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by shatoga on 07-23-2003]

|
Fastwalker
Senior Member
832 posts, Mar 2003
|
posted 07-23-2003 11:56 PM
quote: Hating me, and all others who distrust both sides and seek the truth is a given.
I don't hate you Shat. On the contrary, as I said, I feel sorry for you because I do believe you are under the influence of people and forces that are using you, deluding you. I don't want to destroy you, I want to pull you out of the muck and illuminate your path. I want to help you to see the light. You are not in control of your own destiny right now if you give up that control to Democrats and a leftist philosophy, the only purpose of which is to subjugate you to the whim of truly evil people. Just let logic in...be honest with yourself. Let yourself understand the truth in the arguments of conservatives. Open your mind to the arguments I am making here and have a two way conversation for once. Really, this is common sense. All you have to do is open your eyes to see how much light you are really not seeing, and refuse to see. 
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Fastwalker on 07-23-2003]

|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-30-2003 04:19 AM
>Michael Grant this past Sunday's Issues section of The Tennessean.
The lead story was about Howard Dean's meteoric rise to the national spotlight. It does not take a rocket scientist to predict that Howard Dean, whom Republicans have been advised to contribute to via the internet, will fizzle as fast as he found favor with the fringe.<

|
Fastwalker
Senior Member
832 posts, Mar 2003
|
posted 07-30-2003 04:31 AM
See, Shitoga? This is what happens when you try to post when you're drunk.  
|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 07-30-2003 07:58 PM
Wasn't drinking when I posted about the Tenneseean, but: Re FW's canned RNC talking point reply:Churchill (whom conservatives love because he imprisoned Britons without recourse to trial) Lady: "Sir Winston you're drunk!" Churchill: "Lady; tommorrow I'dd be sober and you'll still be ugly!" FW, Drunk or sober, I recognize truth from lies. Tommorrow I'll be sober and you will still be stupidly self-deluded into worshiping the cult of conservatism. Where you are, I once was... Where I am...you may become... Leave the darkside. Renounce evil. Join us former cult members who love america and distrust the cult of conservatism. Put America first and your cult last. Become a true patriot alongside me. Actually stand for what Republicans once stood for: Support the US Constitution and oppose Bush!

|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1092 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 08-11-2003 11:20 PM
Just posted a link to some posts in this thread. I'd prefer respondents to post in 'other trails" than just this thread.Trying to encourage others (progressive and neo-con)to contribute to CC. Put America first and politics last. Become a true patriot. Actually stand for what Republicans once stood for: Support the US Constitution and oppose Bush! 
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 08-12-2003 03:39 AM
whaddaya' trying to replace me ?that's not very nice... 

|