posted 05-15-2003 06:58 AM            

You are right I have both copies of Ken Adachi's post. One says illuminati (as you and LWH have posted) and the new one does not mention the word?

I was tipped of to visit your comments by Halva and also visited the http://home1.gte.net/quakker/documents/chemtrails_over_america.htm as Halva had told be Adachi was criticising him (quakker), rather than Brian and the Homestead article. Although I do not see Quakker using the term illuminati. I would be interested to know if he is or just by association of the H bomb..perhaps I have just answered my own question!

This came about because I was curious about the nature of the article and I found a copy of it on the lone wolf site. On further investigation I found the original at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chemtrailtrackingusa/message/90260 dated the 27th November 02.

I raised this with Halva about the dates and queried the legitimacy of the post...things did not stack up.

Why am I so interested in this article, well I am Mark Davey and I started this whole thing on a post about disinfo, which was sent to me from a friend ;-) but it was written two years ago and had no reference to Homestead piece, rather the nature of the story etc.

No I am not the author of the great dying, neither the response to it.

Perhaps Brian, Halva, Ken and the original poster of the article should tell us what is going on?

A personal apology to you as I thought you had inserted the term illuminati. I will contact Ken as ask him directly why the term was changed?

regards
Mark.

posted 05-15-2003 11:37 PM               

I got confirmation of its usefulness last Monday, when I took it to the office of a (locally) well-known ecological activist who some years ago moved away from the Green-Eurocommunist milieu to the mainstream (and goveerning) socialists. This was about the time the Green-Eurocoms started developing their weird opinions about the Balkans and who the baddies were there (here).

Anyway, first response to the information is that the person concerned is paying attention. He would not have paid attention if I had taken him something written by Ken Adachi.

That is more significant than the question of whose side the author of the text is on.