|
Author
|
|
Topic: LUCIFERIAN Bush Admin. Supports FAGS!! | Topic page views:
|
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-12-2003 01:13 PM
NEOCONS...Kneel and worship/service your QUEER master Bush boy and his QUEER minions and PAEDOPHILE daddy and VP!Some PHONY 'christian' this slug is!! Who is really nuts? Psychiatric Association debates removing pedophilia as mental disorder http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200306/CUL20030611c.html In a step critics charge could result in decriminalizing sexual contact between adults and children, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) recently sponsored a symposium in which participants discussed the removal of pedophilia from an upcoming edition of the psychiatric manual of mental disorders. (That's because top level SATANISTS like Bush Sr., Dick Cheney and others ARE PAEDOPHILES!!!)
John Ashcroft rules homosexuals can have gay pride celebrations at Justice Department http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41417-2003Jun10.html The Department of Justice yesterday said it will allow employees to hold events marking Gay Pride Month on its property, a statement that comes days after reports that it had banned such events
Justice to Let Staff Honor Gay Pride Department Says Office Events Were Not Barred By Brian Faler Special to The Washington Post Wednesday, June 11, 2003; Page A33 The Department of Justice yesterday said it will allow employees to hold events marking Gay Pride Month on its property, a statement that comes days after reports that it had banned such events.
Gay activists said last week the department told them they could not hold Gay Pride Month observances -- the first time, they said, that a federal agency had disallowed them. That prompted criticism from gay rights groups and some lawmakers, who called the decision discriminatory. Justice Department officials did not return calls Friday about the issue. But spokesman Mark Corallo said yesterday it had never banned the events and attributed the imbroglio to "miscommunication." He said the department had told DOJ Pride, a group that supports its gay employees, that Justice could not sponsor any events without a presidential proclamation. The Bush administration has declined to issue a statement honoring Gay Pride Month. But, Corallo said, the department told the group it could still hold its event; it just wouldn't be sponsored by Justice. DOJ Pride had planned a ceremony next week in the Justice Department's main auditorium to honor two lawyers who have defended gay rights. "They were told -- very clearly -- that, like any properly constituted employees association, they could request the space, it would be granted and they could have their event," he said. "It just would not be officially sponsored." Corallo said he did not know why the department waited several days to clarify its position. That did not satisfy Marina Colby, president of DOJ Pride. "I can't believe they said that," she said. "We were told we couldn't have the event at all, even if we paid for all of it." She called the announcement a "partial reversal," but said it was still discriminatory. Colby said the department sponsors other heritage and diversity events, such as those honoring Black History Month or Hispanic employees. Last year, Justice sponsored the group's gay pride event and Deputy Attorney General Larry D. Thompson addressed the group. Sen. Frank J. Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said yesterday he will ask for hearings on what he called "possible violations of the civil rights by the Department of Justice against their own employees." As for DOJ Pride's awards ceremony, Colby said she did not know if the group will still hold its event in the main auditorium. © 2003 The Washington Post Company

|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2621 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 06-12-2003 02:21 PM
Some PHONY 'christian' this slug is!!Somehow, I don't think Jesus would be bothered by a Gay Pride event. Jesus tried to teach people to love one another, even one's enemies. Do you imagine that Bush would be more 'Christian', if he hated gays? 
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-12-2003 02:39 PM
Gee Thermit... the Bible is real CLEAR on God's hatred for this sin. Love the sinner HATE the sin."A man who lies with another man as a woman is an ABOMINATION to the Lord." And I'm making a sharp point here with regard to our "Skull and Bones" "Bohemian Grove" member president. Both organizations are LUCIFERIAN in their activities and ideology. PAEDOHILIA is confirmed in many top so-called world leaders and Bush Sr. and Cheney are DIRECTLY implicated in trial material hushed up for National Security resons in TN transcripts. This ties to MK-Ultra CIA ABUSE that many have experienced. Documented: http://www.trance-formation.com and elsewhere. Bush Jr. nor Sr. are ANY KIND of 'christian' Thermit! There actions in setting up DEATH CAMPS, POLICE STATE and war upon war should tell any rational person that! Or do you think Jesus would find that 'loving'???? 
|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2621 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 06-12-2003 03:08 PM
There's not much point in talking about religion or what we think God thinks, just avoid the hateful slurs, as in your thread title. Thanks.
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-13-2003 08:45 AM
Does everybody remember when Ashcrack spent THOUSANDS covering up the naked lady statues there in the 'justice' dept.???? This guy has SERIOUS 'issues.' 'Gay Pride' Reversal at Justice Dept Gives Groups Half-a-Loaf By Lawrence Morahan CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer June 12, 2003 (CNSNews.com) - Under pressure from homosexual activist groups and at least two Democratic senators, Attorney General John Ashcroft apparently reversed a decision not to allow U.S. Department of Justice employees to stage events marking "Gay Pride Month" at agency headquarters. Employees may hold "gay pride" events at the agency this year, but they will not be officially sponsored by the department, an official said. The change has left both liberals and conservatives giving some credit to Ashcroft but also expressing concerns that the policy still needs revision. Members of DOJ Pride, a homosexual advocacy group within the agency, said the department denied the group permission to hold an event on June 18 at the agency. This was the first refusal of a federal agency to host a "Gay Pride Month" event, they said. Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the Department of Justice, denied the agency had reversed its position. The confusion was the result of a "miscommunication" between the agency and the group, he said. "The group was not told that they couldn't hold the event. Any properly constituted employee association can request the use of the facilities for their groups' events," Corallo said. "However, the government is not obliged to sponsor nor pay for these events. As it turns out, DOJ Pride was the only employee association that had received sponsorship from the department over the last two years," he said. The decision to allow "gay pride" events at the agency is drawing fire from family policy groups. Concerned Women for America said the government should not get involved with "gay pride business." "We're happy that Attorney General Ashcroft is moving in the right direction, and at least the Department of Justice is not officially endorsing this gay pride event," said Peter LaBarbera, a senior policy analyst at CWA's Culture and Family Institute. "We wish they'd adhered to what was originally reported, that there would be no event at all, but at least it's not endorsed like it was last year," he said. LaBarbera added that it's not something taxpayers should be funding because most taxpayers probably disagree with the idea of celebrating homosexuality. Homosexual advocacy groups cautiously welcomed the decision. "We're pleased that the Department of Justice has lived up to the commitment made by John Ashcroft during his Senate testimony that he would allow gay and lesbian employees to be treated equally, and we hope they take an extra step and offer them the same exact treatment as the other employee associations in regard to sponsorship of the event," said Patrick Guerriero, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans. Winnie Stachelberg, political director of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement, she welcomed "that the DOJ has reversed their decision of the all-out ban on the on-site gay pride event. "However, the new policy is still a step backward as DOJ Pride is being treated differently than it was in the past, and unequally from other agency groups who have the full sponsorship of the department. This policy marginalizes the department's GLBT [gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender] employees," she said. Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said Tuesday he would ask for hearings on what he called possible violations of Department of Justice employees' civil rights. In a June 10 letter to Ashcroft, Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) said he was concerned about the department refusing DOJ Pride the use of its facilities. "Congress and the American people expect the attorney general to ensure equal treatment and equal protection for all Americans. I urge you to reverse the department's decision immediately and allow DOJ Pride to use department facilities to hold meetings and events," Feingold said. DOJ Pride had planned a ceremony for next Wednesday in the department's main auditorium to honor two lawyers who specialize in legal issues relating to homosexuality. E-mail a news tip to Lawrence Morahan. Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

|
theseeker
One moon circles

Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3297 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 06-13-2003 11:15 AM
I'm curious larry...you claim to be a Christian...yet you seem to fight tooth and nail everything revelation is said to predict...are you trying to push back the 2nd coming ? 
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-13-2003 12:16 PM
"WOE unto those who LONG FOR the day of the Lord." SEEKER!!This is a point that's been made. These brain dead NEOCONs actually WANT Armageddon! In so doing, they're working WITH SATANIC / ZIONISTS and satanic PRESIDENTs and VP's!! Evil calls good evil and evil good in these 'last days.' It's like Thermit posting here saying it's futile to talk about religion???!! Give me a break! He's REAL clear on the issue of HOMOSEXUALITY! The only place it gets vague is in PER-VERSION Bibles rewritten of late. IT IS NOT LOVING to allow more homosexuals to think thier actions are OK while they dig their own eternal graves! We are admonished to put stumbling blocks before evil to SLOW this agenda. To hope to avert or DELAY 'judgment' NOT BRING IT ON!!! God has promised to cast into outer darkness those who hold that attitude! And GOOD RIDDANCE!! God IS love, but he's also JUDGMENT. And His Word will be FINAL! His ORIGINAL UNALTERED WORD! 
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-16-2003 09:33 AM
BUSH JR., MIX HIM IN WITH THE GAYS? Posted By: TONZAL Date: Sunday, 15 June 2003, 7:26 p.m. >http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=32919 > >Sherman: >[1] sordid private life, male sex-mate he travels with(see our >homosexual underground item), Mayor of sizeable southern town. What does this all mean? ------------- BUSH JR., MIX HIM IN WITH THE GAYS? Complete story at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/06/15/MN184416.DTL Landmark gay ruling may put Bush in bind Sunday, June 15, 2003 Washington -- The Supreme Court will decide within the next two weeks one of the most important cases in the history of civil rights for lesbian and gay Americans, reigniting a battle in the Republican Party that President Bush has delicately sought to avoid. At issue in Lawrence and Garner vs. Texas is a state sodomy law that strikes the most fundamental chords within the GOP and threatens to split two party blocs pivotal to Bush's re-election. The case involves two gay men, John Lawrence and Tyron Garner, who were arrested Sept. 17, 1998, in their home in Harris County, Texas, for having consensual sex after a neighbor falsely reported a "weapons disturbance." Police entered their home, discovered them "engaged in deviate sexual intercourse" and jailed them under the Texas homosexual conduct statute. A decision for the plaintiffs would -- for the first time -- guarantee equal protection for gays and lesbians under the 14th Amendment, much as Brown vs. Board of Education did for African Americans nearly a half-century ago. Depending on its decision, the court could also guarantee for lesbians and gays a constitutional right to privacy. Gay Republicans contend that not just equality but the decriminalization of their existence is at stake. Allied with Republican moderates who want to reach out to socially tolerant swing voters, they contend that the case concerns violations of core American values of privacy and equal protection.

|
ChemCaptain
Senior Member

United States 495 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 06-16-2003 10:03 AM
Okay.. We get that you are anti-gay... Jesus, enough!Find a new name to call Bush in every thread. 
|
Fastwalker
Senior Member
832 posts, Mar 2003
|
posted 06-16-2003 03:41 PM
Like I say, we need to keep Crazy Larry away from sharp objects, for his own safety and that of society.
|
theseeker
One moon circles

Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3297 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 06-16-2003 05:29 PM
These brain dead NEOCONs actually WANT Armageddon!how do you bring about something that will happen anyway ? armageddon is a good thing larry...unless your not confortable in your faith...or are a bad person... well larry... 
|
ChemCaptain
Senior Member

United States 495 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 06-16-2003 10:00 PM
I disagree.. That armegeddon is a good thing.  
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-17-2003 04:16 PM
Like daddy Bush, Cheney and so many other CORRUPTED so-called world wierd leaders, this SICKNESS is prevalent at the top of the heap. They say cream rises to the top, well so does the SCUM and that's what all these creeps ARE!Portugal reeling over child sex abuse scandal The opposition socialists, until now ahead of Portugal's ruling conservative Popular Social Democrats in opinion polls, are in shock after learning some of their senior MPs may be involved in scandal over sex abuse of boys in a state orphanage. http://www.prisonplanet.com/061603sexrings.html 
|
Ludolph
New Member

New York 1 posts, Jun 2003
|
posted 06-20-2003 04:46 AM
No, young man. The source of all homosexuality is not discussed in the old, but only in the New Tetstament. Paul sais it is a punishmeht given by God to sinners. Women become lesbian acoording to Paul because of the sins of their husbands, men, becuase of their own sind. So the Bible sias God hates a sin he creates himself. Homoseuals argue that it would nbe blasphemy therefore to resist the punishment of God and their homosexuality. Paul sais too that homosexuals also deserve punishmeht for their received punishmeht (death penalty). If you think that is strange, it was none other then Nitzsche who asked: an eternal Paul, who could stand an eternal Paul? quote: Originally posted by hitech_46253: Gee Thermit... the Bible is real CLEAR on God's hatred for this sin. Love the sinner HATE the sin."A man who lies with another man as a woman is an ABOMINATION to the Lord." And I'm making a sharp point here with regard to our "Skull and Bones" "Bohemian Grove" member president. Both organizations are LUCIFERIAN in their activities and ideology. PAEDOHILIA is confirmed in many top so-called world leaders and Bush Sr. and Cheney are DIRECTLY implicated in trial material hushed up for National Security resons in TN transcripts. This ties to MK-Ultra CIA ABUSE that many have experienced. Documented: http://www.trance-formation.com and elsewhere. Bush Jr. nor Sr. are ANY KIND of 'christian' Thermit! There actions in setting up DEATH CAMPS, POLICE STATE and war upon war should tell any rational person that! Or do you think Jesus would find that 'loving'????

|
the professor
exposing the mechanisms of evil

heartland USA 770 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 06-20-2003 11:16 PM
QUOTE No, young man. The source of all homosexuality is not discussed in the old, but only in the New Tetstament. Paul sais it is a punishmeht given by God to sinners. Women become lesbian acoording to Paul because of the sins of their husbands, men, becuase of their own sind. So the Bible sias God hates a sin he creates himself. Homoseuals argue that it would nbe blasphemy therefore to resist the punishment of God and their homosexuality. Paul sais too that homosexuals also deserve punishmeht for their received punishmeht (death penalty). If you think that is strange, it was none other then Nitzsche who asked: an eternal Paul, who could stand an eternal Paul? I think you are way off, says is spelled says btw, you easily forget the lessons from sodom and gomorrah. 
|
Dizzer
New Member

Netherlands, The Hague 25 posts, Jun 2003
|
posted 06-21-2003 05:24 AM
"I'm the commander, I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the in- teresting thing about being the President. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation...." — G. W. Bush

|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
588 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 06-21-2003 12:59 PM
this whole topic is unfair. After all the only major organized homosexual/political organization in America is the Log Cabin Republicans. http://www.lcr.org who took their name from America's first homosexual President. Honest Abe (according to them)When I was 'stuck in Lodi' lived and worked in Lodi California. And Rush was a talkie on a sacramento local station. My neighbor used to talk about meeting Rush Limbaugh in the gay bars. When I asked him if Rush was gay; he replied "God! I hope not! (that image made my gay neighbor want to vomit) I was an early caller to Rush in 1984-87 and have talked to him off the air also. Rush, off mike is not the strutting extremist that he is well-paid to portray on mike. I see no problem. Don't ask what my wife and I do in private. I promise I won't ask what 2 men do in private. Fallwell, asscroft and others obsessed with homosexuality should just hold their Bibles in front of their pants during gay pride parades. (and pretend we haven't noticed what turns them on- what they seem to be obsessed with) I personally feel more comfortable among those conservatives obsessed with Hilary. I think she's cute too!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by shatoga on 06-21-2003]

|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-27-2003 03:27 PM
JEW PSYCHIATRISTS WANT PEDOPHILIA 'NORMALISED' [politicalsoldier.net says: Need we say anything? This is the same agenda as that promoted by groups like OutRage, the homosexual militants in the UK. They want us to believe that paedophilia is 'normal'. We mustn't let these people get away with their campaign to whitewash a very great evil]: Jewish-Dominated APA Moves To Normalize Pedophilia After All, As Freud Says, Its Normal To Have Sex With Your Mother 6/17/2003 12:22:40 PM LifeSite Daily News San FAG-cisco, California -- APA NOW WANTS TO NORMALIZE PEDOPHILIA San Francisco, June 10, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Confirming LifeSite's previous warning about serious ongoing efforts to legitimize adult-child sex, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) recently sponsored a symposium in which participants discussed the removal of pedophilia from the psychiatric manual of mental disorders. Cybercast news Service reports today that Psychiatrists at the May 19 conference in San Francisco proposed removing several long-recognized categories of mental illness - including pedophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, transvestitism, voyeurism and sadomasochism - from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). "Normalizing" pedophilia would have enormous implications, especially since civil laws closely follow the scientific community on social-moral matters, said Linda Ames Nicolosi, NARTH publications director. "If pedophilia is deemed normal by psychiatrists, then how can it remain illegal?" Nicolosi asked. "It will be a tough fight to prove in the courts that it should still be against the law." Another logical question is how this development would also affect the battle against currently growing volumes of child porn? Source: LifeSite Daily News 
|
Mech
Resisting the NWO

Northeast USA 3907 posts, Sep 2002
|
posted 06-27-2003 04:31 PM
Shatoga:"--I personally feel more comfortable among those conservatives obsessed with Hilary. I think she's cute too!--"OMG!! BLEACH!!! Whooolll HURL! Please don't say Tipper!!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 06-27-2003]

|
ChemCaptain
Senior Member

United States 495 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 06-28-2003 09:03 AM
"San FAG-cisco"Did you put that or the article Larry? Anti-semetic, anti-gay... Let me guess, you don't like blacks either? Do you have any white sheets with holes in them laying around?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by ChemCaptain on 06-28-2003] 
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-28-2003 12:19 PM
Chemmie Lt. sounds like typical ADL SCUM!Sorry Charlie, but I agree with the REAL jews who oppose Israel, ZIONISM and have a healthy respect for the Torah and 10 commandments. And THEY OPPOSE QUEERS!! It's the Talmudic satanic ZIONISTS like those that infest the Bush Admin. that embrace PAEDOPHILIA, QUEERS and other horrid things the Bible specifically condemns. But you'll learn that when you're WITH them for all eternity. Kneel and service your master chemmie! 
|
theseeker
One moon circles

Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3297 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 06-28-2003 08:26 PM
whoa !After all the only major organized homosexual/political organization in America is the Log Cabin Republicans. really ? the only one huh...wait a minute !!! wrong again shitogy ! http://www.stonewalldemocrats.org/index.html


|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 06-29-2003 11:18 AM
Oh there's sick faggots and paedophiles in BOTH parties. The Repugs dealt in Paedophilia and brought in kiddies you can research under: "The Franklin Coverup." Here's some more on them bringing their sick garbage into the open:Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Republican Sodomy http://www.reedheustis.com/articles/06272003.htm BLAME THE GOP FOR PRO-SODOMY COURT DECISION
By: Reed R. Heustis, Jr. June 27, 2003 With one stroke of the pen, faggotry has triumphed at the Supreme Court.
And guess what? Republican-appointed Justices are to blame. With a convincing 6-3 decision in Lawrence v. Texas, the United States Supreme Court on June 26 overturned a 1986 case, Bowers v. Hardwick, which had upheld the legitimacy of an anti-sodomy law. Sodomites and perverts all across America are hailing the Lawrence decision as the biggest gay rights victory in our nation's history. Mitchell Katine, the openly gay attorney representing John Lawrence and Tyron Garner, the men whose arrest in 1998 led to the decision, proclaimed, "this is a day of independence." Whereas homosexual deviancy has long been celebrated in the media and on our university campuses over the last two decades, the Johnny-come-lately Supreme Court now joins the orgy. As dissenting Justice Antonin Scalia correctly stated, "The court has taken sides in the culture war...." How could this have happened? Weren't Republicans supposed to be the champions of traditional values? Weren't Republicans supposed to be the stalwart defenders of our nation's Christian heritage? Seriously, just think: Every four years without fail, the Republican Party instructs Christians to elect Republicans to office so that we can thwart the left wing agenda of the Democratic Party. Every four years without fail, the Republican Establishment warns its rank and file never to vote for a third party candidate, lest we elect a Democrat by default by "giving him the election". Every four years without fail, Christians are told that third party candidates cannot win, and that a vote for a third party candidate is somehow a vote for the Democrat. Every four years without fail, Christians are bamboozled into believing that their beloved Republican Party will restore this nation to its Christian heritage. Every four years without fail, we are told that only a Republican can appoint a conservative Justice to the high bench so that liberalism can be stopped cold. Without fail. Christians, wake up! It is the Republican Party that is responsible for moronic decisions such as Lawrence. Quit blaming the liberals and the Democrats. Blame the GOP! Out of the six Justices that formed the horrifying 6-3 Lawrence majority, four were appointed by Republicans! Four! Justice John Paul Stevens was nominated by President Gerald Ford - a Republican. Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy were nominated by President Ronald Reagan - a Republican. Justice David Souter was nominated by President George H.W. Bush - a Republican. Two-thirds of the majority opinion were Republican-appointed! "I believe this needs to be trumpeted," says Tim Farness, 1st District Representative of the Constitution Party of Wisconsin. Indeed it does. A 4-2 majority of the six Justices forming the Lawrence decision was Republican-appointed. Republican President George W. Bush intends to run for a second term in 2004. Don't be too surprised when we start hearing the same-old song and dance all over again: "Elect Republicans so that we can defeat the Democratic agenda." Mr. President: the Republican Party IS the Democratic agenda. © AD 2003 The Heustis Update, accessible on the web at www.ReedHeustis.com. All Rights Reserved.
Teno Groppi - Country Celebration http://www.baptistlink.com/godandcountry/html/country.0 Constitution Party - Past WI District & County Rep. Democrats and Republicans are two wings of a bird flying the WRONG way! If we are not "One Nation Under God", we'll just be "one nation under". Attachment Converted: "F:\INTERNET\DNLOAD\FwRepubl.htm"

|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 07-03-2003 05:14 PM
President Bush won’t endorse constitutional amendment banning gay marriages http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63871-2003Jul2.html President Bush on Wednesday declined to endorse the idea of an amendment to the U.S. Constitution banning same-sex marriages, saying he did not know if one was necessary yet. Bush: Too Soon for Amendment Banning Gay Marriage
E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Version Subscribe to The Post Reuters Wednesday, July 2, 2003; 1:14 PM WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush on Wednesday declined to endorse the idea of an amendment to the U.S. Constitution banning same-sex marriages, saying he did not know if one was necessary yet. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican and a close Bush ally in Congress, said on Sunday he "absolutely" supported a constitutional amendment that would define marriage as being between a man and a woman. He spoke after the Supreme Court struck down state sodomy laws. "I don't know if it's necessary yet," Bush told reporters at the White House. "Let's let the lawyers look at the full ramifications of the recent Supreme Court hearing." He added: "What I do support is a notion that marriage is between a man and a woman." U.S. law defines marriage for federal purposes as between one woman and one man. Gay marriages are forbidden in the United States but Vermont allows civil unions. Debate over the issue has intensified since Canada announced earlier this month it would legalize gay marriages. The U.S. high court last week struck down state sodomy laws, a decision that conservative critics say could open the door to same-sex marriages in the United States. 
|
hitech_46253
Senior Member
Indianapolis, IN U.S. 472 posts, May 2001
|
posted 07-18-2003 07:26 AM
Again and again. If you support Bush, just like Hitler you're supporting OCCULTISTS, PAEDOPHILES, PERVERTS AND FAGS!!And may you end up where THEY ARE GOING! Homosexual Republicans: We have easy access to Bush White House Log Cabin Club leader says group consulted weekly http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33587 The leader of the nation's most well-known homosexual Republican organization says his group is consulted on nearly a weekly basis by the White House. 'Gay' Repubs hail White House access Log Cabin Club leader says group consulted weekly -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: July 16, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com The leader of the nation's most well-known homosexual Republican organization says his group is consulted on nearly a weekly basis by the White House.
"(O)ur access is unprecedented," Log Cabin Club executive director Patrick Guerriero told Metro Weekly, a Washington-area homosexual magazine. "I'm not sure there's been a week that I've been on the job where we haven't been called to the White House or asked to attend a meeting with the Republican leadership to discuss issues ranging from tax fairness to judicial nominations to global and domestic AIDS policy." The article was e-mailed yesterday between the leaders of many conservative Christian and pro-family groups, some of which have complained openly about being taken for granted by the Bush White House. Guerriero says in the interview his focus is on finding "fair-minded Republicans" to make the Republican Party more open and accepting of homosexuality. Guerriero describes himself as "a conservative Republican." "But I define conservatism as government staying out of my personal decisions, and recognizing everyone as valued members of the American family," he adds. "It was a conservative Supreme Court that just wrote the most significant legal decision in the history of gay and lesbian civil rights. It was Anthony Kennedy, appointed by Ronald Reagan, who wrote this decision that we're heralding as the greatest victory in the history of the gay and lesbian civil rights movement. It's a reminder that you can be conservative in America and believe that gays and lesbians are an equal part of the American family." 
| |