posted 06-30-2003 09:05 PM            

PRESS RELEASE, June 29th, 2003: SavageStupidity.com Hails Victory in Domain Name Dispute vs. Talk Radio Network and Michael Savage.
http://www.savagestupidity.com/

posted 07-06-2003 11:22 PM            

Weenies of a feather flock together.

In the case of Savage listeners.

He wants to Nuke people? Well mabye Savage and his loved ones should stand within the blast radius to teach HIM a lesson!

It MIGHT change his sadistic mind.

posted 04-16-2004 09:34 AM            

(The real Michael Savage Wiener -- on the right -- from a photo taken in the 60's)

Oily beatnik Neo-Con radio host Michael Savage, who has previously and repeatedly called for anyone who criticizes the government to be put in concentration camps, has now advocated the arrest of US newspaper editors.

Note from Infowars.com: Alex heard Savage calling Iraqis "subhuman." This is blatant Nazi terminology, but because Savage is a "politically correct" neocon, he is allowed to use language that would get others in a lot of trouble. If you listen to his message carefully, he's actually promoting the globalist agenda while mislabeling those who fight it as being part of the New World Order.

Alex has heard Savage say that we have to get behind Bush's War in Iraq, the Patriot Act and Homeland Security. He's also said that we need to create a domestic spy force with citizens watching each other's every move. Savage has the nerve to claim that by doing this we're really fighting the New World Order (and that Bush is fighting the New World Order).

Bush and his Daddy have both talked about a "New World Order," and how they want to bring it to fruition. Savage will pay lip service to conservative issues while helping promote the globalist agenda by labeling patriots as traitors.

Paul Joseph Watson | April 15 2004

Oily beatnik Neo-Con radio host Michael Savage, who has previously and repeatedly called for anyone who criticizes the government to be put in concentration camps, has now advocated the arrest of US newspaper editors.

In a poll on his website, Savage (real name 'Wiener') displays a photo of an Iraqi holding up a US soldiers' boots which was published in the New York Times. Savage asks the question, 'Do you think the publisher of the NY Times should be arrested for sedition for showing enemy propaganda?'

It is the job of a publisher/journalist/photographer to print and disseminate the truth, however horrible it may be. Savage implies that the publisher should only print what is favorable to the government. This is propaganda.

The poll currently shows 65% in favor of arresting the publisher, although when I checked the poll last night it was as high as 85% at one point.

It is common knowledge that this 'bastion of conservatism' was once a liberal hippie. He still advocates the books and philosophy of literary beatniks Jack Kerouac and William Burroughs, whose books included glorification of drug use.

As Alex Jones has stated many times, the liberals couldn't ram through the entirety of their police state agenda, so they just put on sheep's clothing and returned as self-proclaimed conservatives and are attempting to destroy America.

Mr. Wiener, like a plethora of other so-called right-wing talk show hosts, is a dangerous anti-American who hates freedom and what the founding fathers created. While he has a first amendment right to voice his comments, we feel the need to challenge them and will continue to monitor his subversive and extremist activities.

posted 04-16-2004 11:52 AM            

quote:

---

As Alex Jones has stated many times, the liberals couldn't ram through the entirety of their police state agenda, so they just put on sheep's clothing and returned as self-proclaimed conservatives and are attempting to destroy America.

---

This is where I go off with Alex. Alex is decidely Right-of-Center, although I consider him a Paul Revere of sorts against the NWO, and a voracious speaker, he could be barking at the wrong Bush, namely Liberals. Because someone is liberal or a hippy or cyberpunk, does not make them auotmatically a police state advocate.

posted 04-16-2004 01:21 PM            

You and I both know that everything positive that came out of the 60s was demonized and
spat at in the press as if to say "Don't ever
try anything like that ever again..becausse it WORKED..a little too well."

However, you must admit that there were a few SOCIALISTS who wanted to influence government or take positions of power to push a trotskyite agenda. As we see with the likes of michael savage. Once a trotskyite socialist machavellian, always a trotskyite socialist machavellian.

Minus the long hair, beard and purse.

posted 04-16-2004 02:12 PM            

I don't see "Socialism" as quite the problem as a totalitarian regime or idea.

Socialism out of control turns to communism turns to totalitarianism.

Democracy out of control, turns to capitalism turns to fascism.

I always thought the best system was Democratic Socialism, where one can make plenty of money, but a Vietnam Vet with one-leg will always have a home. Of course, some poor people will always milk such a system, as a corporate people will always get federal welfare in a capitalist system.