posted 01-22-2004 12:19 AM            

I love the way he ties symbolism into his pieces and his writing style is entertaining. This is one of his better articles - I know it's long, but it's so worth reading.

http://www.clydelewis.com/dis/societal4/societal4.htm

THE HANGMAN EQUALS DEATH! THE DEVIL EQUALS DEATH! DEATH EQUALS DEATH!"--Skull and Bones "death mantra."

The year 2004 began as the year of fear and vulnerability. The message of possible death has loomed over this country as the terror barometer changes colors over night and the government has secretly signed provisions to expand their repression and their revocation of civil liberties.

As long as there is a crisis, as long as we believe that there is an imminent threat the Government will have carte blanche and will continue to push the envelope.

It is unfortunate that the news does not look good on this front but the warnings went out years ago and it seems that majority of Americans have chosen to continue the journey into the 21st century fearful and distressed.

The mantras are set in motion. The edicts of Imperialism and religious fanaticism are being interwoven in a Hegelian plan that keeps a nation crippled because of a shrewd propaganda campaign that encourages blind faith in leaders who believe that a nation "under God’ has it’s mandate from heaven.

This is the ultimate deception.

Using the ploy of convincing the populace that all decisions are based on a "God given Mandate" is the highest form of Luciferian control. It smacks of cult behavior and it is my observation that terror alert changes, and the conditioning of the populace is similar to the Kool aid Drills that were being implemented in Jonestown.

On November 18, 1978, the Reverend Jim Jones ordered the 911 members of his flock to kill themselves by drinking grape Kool Aid laced with Cyanide. They willingly did so. The people were brainwashed by Jones and were told that God blessed their Utopia and that if anyone tried to disrupt the community they would fight with their guns.

When Jones felt that he was threatened he convinced his followers to die with him.

Looking back I remember when the tragedy happened the comments about Jim Jones were eerily similar to the comments that have been whispered about George W. Bush.

People believe that Jones developed a deity complex and that he put himself above the law. Jones was preparing to fight a literal Armageddon against other human beings that he believed to be "evil doers" and that he mandated that anyone who was out to destroy this Utopia were degenerates. A Utopia that he felt was seen as divine in the eyes of God. He was looked upon as a leader that was getting divine information from God, information that would insure safety and refuge from outsiders who oppose their newfound independence.

As with most cults, followers are asked to make changes that the leaders themselves do not make.

When religious authorities tell you that sacrifices must be made to ward off demonic attacks you can hold a mirror up to our Government and you can see that the sacrifices of civil liberties are encouraged to ward off terrorists and terrorism.

Little by little we are being groomed into the flock and history shows that this type of behavior will lead to a major tragedy where the people fall for an orchestrated crisis.

It has been said in many circles that the noose is tightening around America and that we are going willingly to the gallows. No one is aware of when the trap door will open. When it does the worst case scenario is that our country will make dramatic changes.

These changes will be implemented as a fearful country is reminded that they are in the crosshairs for possible terrorist attacks. These changes will also negate any and all parts of the Constitution.

Now you may think that this is all conspiracy theory and paranoid delusion, however times have changed and our government officials are already conceding that they are on the ready to take away civil liberties and revoke the constitution for the sake of safety.

"The world has changed dramatically in the last fifty years, and particularly in the last decade. Institutions designed in another age may or may not be appropriate for the future. It is the mandate of the United States Commission on National Security/21st Century to examine precisely that question. It has undertaken to do so in three phases: the first to describe the world emerging in the first quarter of the next century, the second to design a national security strategy appropriate to that world, and the third to propose necessary changes to the national security structure in order to implement that strategy effectively."— Taken from the preface of American Security for the 21st Century.

This in my opinion would basically be a form of surrender to the terrorist threat.

It would also be surrender to the New World Order. We are learning that this Order is clearly a Satanic Dynasty that uses a Mandate of Heaven to enforce it’s global dominance. When I speak of the Mandate of Heaven I am speaking about the ancient trick that has been used to manipulate a people from feeling any remorse for mass murder, or mass hatred, for a group of people whom they consider to be a threat to their righteousness and their divine purpose.

The mandate of heaven was a Chinese concept used to justify the rule of the kings of the Zhou Dynasty and later the Emperors of China. The concept of the mandate of heaven was that a king's rule was based on the blessing of heaven and that if a king ruled unwisely, heaven would be displeased and would give the mandate to someone else.

The concept was first used by the Zhou dynasty to justify their overthrow of the Shang dynasty and was used by many succeeding dynasties to justify their rule.

One consequence of the idea of the mandate of heaven was that it was not necessary for a person to be of noble birth to lead a revolt and become a legitimate emperor, and in fact a number of dynasties such as the Han dynasty and Ming dynasty were founded by persons of modest birth.

The idea of mandate of heaven was linked to the notion of dynastic cycle in which a dynasty started strong and vigorously but gradually would succumb to immorality and be replaced by a new stronger dynasty. The notion of the mandate of heaven was also invoked by Mencius a Chinese philosopher and Sage.

The idea was different from the European notion of Divine right of kings in that it legitimized the overthrow of a dynasty and it also put some limits on the behavior of the emperor. If the emperor ruled unwisely or failed to perform the proper rituals, the emperor could lose the mandate of heaven and be overthrown.

One has to look at the war on terror as an attempt to create a real threat to the divine rite of a New World Order. We have singled out one "Emperor" (Hussein) who has failed to rule wisely and one dynasty (Bush) has seen fit to over throw the other.

On September 11th, 1990 George Herbert Walker Bush spoke the divine charge.

"We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times . . . a new world order can emerge: a new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace."—George H.W. Bush September 11th, 1990

Notice how Bush senior says "Out of these troubled times. A New World Order can emerge."

In other words from chaos comes order, or in the Latin Ordo Ab Chao.

This has been termed a Satanic or Luciferian concept. It is believed that this concept is a cornerstone thought form in most secret societies. Most secret societies and enclave cults base their belief systems in death and chaos and from this death and from chaos will come human alchemy or the perfection of the human being.

Both George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush are members of the Skull and Bones' society, a secretive and subversive organization that performs death rituals with human skulls and bones, chant death mantras, perform masturbatory rituals, and some initiates are made to lie naked in a coffin.

The Bonesmen as they are nicknamed are part of what has been called the most powerful secret society in the country. The Secret Doctrine of Societies such as these can be a bit confusing. However I covered a great deal of explanation as to the purpose of playing both sides into the middle when I wrote about the Hegelian dialectic.

"Our world leaders have adopted Hegelian techniques to insure compliance. It is evident that they make their decisions based on agreements made by elite, secret societies. Their actions and decisions can’t be explained completely to people who have not been exposed to Hegelian dialectic. In Hegelian philosophy the conflict of the conservative right or liberal left, good or evil, thesis and antithesis is important to these secret elitists in order to give you that harsh push forward."—From the Ground Zero article: Deus Irae 2004: Let’s get ready to Crumble ©2003 by Clyde Lewis

This Order or New World Order from Old World Chaos has been an underlying concept that can be found in the seal of the United States. The great eye in the pyramid appears on the dollar bill and the words "Novus Ordo Seclurum" appear declaring the objective of the secret society.

A new order of the ages from the ashes of the old order.

In order for the New Order to be established there needs to be a crisis either real or manufactured that will bring about change. It is the political dictum that "crisis leads to opportunity."

The current leadership of the world is pursuing a Global Government. They are using the Hegelian crisis management tactic to create a schism in the World. The division of the people and the resulting terrorism gives the governments an opportunity to assume that the "Old Institutions" need to be abolished and that there are new ideas and laws that when implemented, would create a government that pretends to protect and appears to be looking out for the safety and well being of it’s people.

If you don’t believe any this, if you think this is all conspiratorial Paranoia I would like to acquaint you with the provisions and ideas presented in the American Security for the 21st Century report entitled "New World Coming" presented September 15th, 1999:

This paper consists of four parts: a contextual introduction; an articulation of twelve basic assumptions and observations; fourteen key conclusions about the global environment of the next quarter century; and a statement of their essential meaning for American national security strategy in the 21st century. The U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century will build upon this foundation to recommend a new strategy for the advancement of American interests and values. It will then propose, as necessary, new structures and processes for U.S. foreign and security policies in order to implement that strategy.

Introduction

In the next century, the spread of knowledge, the development of new technologies, and an increasing recognition of common global problems will present vast opportunities for economic growth, regional integration, and global political cooperation. The size of the world's middle class may increase many times over, lifting literally tens of millions of people from the depredations of poverty and disease. Authoritarian regimes will increasingly founder as they try to insulate their populations from a world brimming with free-flowing information, new economic opportunities, and spreading political freedoms. We may thus see the rise of many new democracies and the strengthening of several older ones. However fragile this process may be, it holds the hope of less conflict in the world than exists today.

Realizing these possibilities, however, will require concerted action on the part of the United States and other mature democracies around the world. Active American engagement cannot prevent all problems, but wise policies can mitigate many of them. The United States and governments of kindred spirit must work harder to prevent conflicts as well as respond to them after the fact. Otherwise, the promise of the next century may never be realized, for greater global connectedness can lead to an increased possibility of misfortune as well as benefit.

The future is one of rising stakes. While humanity has an unprecedented opportunity to succor its poor, heal its sick, compose its disagreements, and find new purpose in common global goals, failure at these tasks could produce calamity on a worldwide scale. Thanks to the continuing integration of global financial networks, economic downturns that were once normally episodic and local may become more systemic and fully global in their harmful effects. Isolated epidemics could metastasize into global pandemics. The explosion in scientific discoveries now under way bears the potential of near miraculous benefit for humanity; misused, in the hands of despots, the new science could become a tool of genocide on an unprecedented scale. During the next 25 years, dilemmas arising from advances in biotechnology increasingly will force some cultures to reexamine the very foundations of their ethical structures. As society changes, our concept of national security will expand and our political values will be tested. In every sphere, our moral imaginations will be exercised anew.

For all that will be novel in the next century, some things will not change. Historical principles will still apply. There will still be great powers, and their interaction in pursuit of their own self-interests will still matter. As ever, much will depend on the sagacity and good character of leadership. Misunderstandings, misjudgments, and mistakes will still occur, but so will acts of bravery borne on the insight of exceptional men and women.

Today, and in the world we see emerging, American leadership will be of paramount importance. The American moment in world history will not last forever; nothing wrought by man does. But for the time being, a heavy responsibility rests on both its power and its values. It is a rare moment and a special opportunity in history when the acknowledged dominant global power seeks neither territory nor political empire. Every effort must be made to ensure that this responsibility is discharged wisely. It is to this end that our study is ultimately directed.

Our View of the Future

As we look to the future, we believe that:

1. An economically strong United States is likely to remain a primary political, military, and cultural force through 2025, and will thus have a significant role in shaping the international environment.

2. The stability and direction of American society and politics will help shape U.S. foreign policy goals and capacities, and hence the way the United States may affect the global future.

3. Science and technology will continue to advance and become more widely available and utilized around the world, but their benefits will be less evenly distributed.

4. World energy supplies will remain largely based on fossil fuels.

5. While much of the world will experience economic growth, disparities in income will increase and widespread poverty will persist.

6. The international aspects of business and commerce (trade, transportation, telecommunications, investment and finance, manufacturing, and professional services) will continue to expand.

7. Non-governmental organizations (refugee aid organizations, religious and ethnic advocacy groups, environmental and other single-issue lobbies, international professional associations, and others) will continue to grow in importance, numbers, and in their international role.

8. Though it will raise important issues of sovereignty, the United States will find it in its national interest to work with and strengthen a variety of international organizations.

9. The United States will remain the principal military power in the world.

10. Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, chemical, and biological) and weapons of mass disruption (information warfare) will continue to proliferate to a wider range of state and non-state actors. Maintenance of a robust nuclear deterrent therefore remains essential as well as investment in new forms of defense against these threats.

11. We should expect conflicts in which adversaries, because of cultural affinities different from our own, will resort to forms and levels of violence shocking to our sensibilities.

12. As the United States confronts a variety of complex threats, it will often be dependent on allies; but it will find reliable alliances more difficult to establish and sustain.

Conclusions

On the basis of the foregoing beliefs, and our understanding of the broad context of the international security environment that will emerge over the next quarter century, we conclude that:

posted 01-22-2004 12:28 AM            

Keep them in the dark at WHAT REALLY HAPPENS behind the scenes.