Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
Who's Linking
What's Popular
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote

  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Other Trails
  WTC internal explosives wired when building was built? (Page 7)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 9 pages long:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7  8 9
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   WTC internal explosives wired when building was built?

Topic page views:

JerseyBluEyz
Trust the Universe


Northeast
583 posts, Jul 2003

posted 02-07-2004 08:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JerseyBluEyz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by letxa2000:
But LeBreton's resume includes "Designed the first successful “Perpetual Motion” Device; and designed an internal combustion engine to run “Perpetually” with Permanent Magnets providing the energy, rather than fuel." Ask your friend if a perpetual motion device is possible? And, more to the point I was originally getting at, ask him if an internal combustion engine that doesn't use fuel is, in fact, internal combustion?

What you have in italics is the statement I previously sent my friend, but I’ll be sure to send him the above paragraph with your questions.

Just so you know (I not sure if you’re aware of it or not) but I’ve worked in the Intellectual Property field for almost 10 years, so I know about trade secrets and non-disclosure agreements.

IP Logged

letxa2000
Senior Member


U.S. citizen in Mexico
327 posts, Dec 2003

posted 02-07-2004 10:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for letxa2000     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JerseyBluEyz:
What you have in italics is the statement I previously sent my friend, but I’ll be sure to send him the above paragraph with your questions.

Thank you. As I said, my question wasn't about the physical possibility of such a device, but whether it would legitimately be called "internal combustion" if it doesn't use a fuel that "combusts." I think your friend called it a "magnetic motor."

This might be the kind of nitpicking BoomerChick things is irrelevant, but such a glaring mistake on an already-questionable resume is very, very suspicious.

IP Logged

JerseyBluEyz
Trust the Universe


Northeast
583 posts, Jul 2003

posted 02-08-2004 06:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JerseyBluEyz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Letxa: As promised, I forwarded your response to my friend. This is what I sent him.

Letxa responded to your input, can you please answer back: LeBreton's resume includes "Designed the first successful “Perpetual Motion” Device; and designed an internal combustion engine to run “Perpetually” with Permanent Magnets providing the energy, rather than fuel." Ask your friend if a perpetual motion device is possible? And, more to the point I was originally getting at, ask him if an internal combustion engine that doesn't use fuel is, in fact, internal combustion?

The below response is based solely on the blurb above. If documentation was provided, such as a patent, then a more thorough response could be given.

His response: Sounds to me like the internal combustion engine was the recipient of the retrofitted magnetic device and, as such, the combustion engine is no longer considered a combustion engine because it now runs on magnetic power...vs. fossil fuel. It may well utilize the compression of air as an assist to the magnetics.

And yes, semi-P.M. devices are possible. The correct term is long running devices. The fewer moving parts the better because if a part in the system breaks down then your device isn’t perpetual. My QEG (Quantum Electro-Gravitics) unit is an example of a perpetual device / long running. As long as none of the electrical parts break down, it will continue to operate indefinitely or unless it uses up all the atoms in the universe, which ever comes first.

IP Logged

shatoga
Agent Provocateur


963 posts, Nov 2002

posted 02-08-2004 07:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shatoga     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Taking a thread off on a tangent instead of continuing discussion of the topic is a neo-con debating trick.
lexta seems to be following rush's playbook.

the towers wre=ere demolished in an implosion pattern
is what all photographic and vioeo evidence supports.
diversions off topic onto irrelevancies, as the cult of conservatism dictates/
disregarded as the strawman diversions they are intended to be.
Back on topic...

Deliberate controlled demolition of the WTC buildings,
as all unbiased evidence supports...

IP Logged

Boomer Chick
Senior Member


Colorado
608 posts, Sep 2003

posted 02-09-2004 12:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Boomer Chick     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks, Shatoga!

My reaction to Bazant reposted:

quote:
First of all, this was written way too soon to have had advantage of various footages, witness accounts, knowledge of the melted steel at the bottom, and other evidences. His premise is based on: "The analysis shows that if prolonged heating caused the majority of columns of a single floor to lose their load carrying capacity, the whole tower was doomed." I disagree with this premise as people from the above floors were able to escape through stairways. It has never been proven that any floor was heated (especially in the South tower, which was the first to collapse, and the damage was done to only a corner) evenly to provide for the plasticity this article claims. The whole article and the math, then, is inaccurate as the plausibility of the premise of equal heating of even one floor is unlikely, especially in the South Tower as the jet fuel and plane were confined to only one corner and the fuel was burned up mainly on the outside of the building. Another point? This article was written too early. I might e-mail this person, Bazant, and ask if he has rewritten another explanation based on more prudent and up-to-date information.

Regardless of any other sentences in this paper, the initial theory and synopsis is consistent and the true underlying assumption for the whole paper. If one disagrees with this assumption, the whole paper is moot.

Why I agree with Grimmer:

quote:
...how much these collapses resembled a controlled demolition. Indeed, this was the first reaction of V. Romero of New Mexico Tech, until he recanted days later [Ref. (1)]. There has been much discussion on the internet of the observed anomalies associated with the WTC building collapses (including the delayed collapse of the unstruck WTC7).

First of all, I agree that the videos and the actual performance of the building resembled a demolition -- not that I'm an expert, but I do agree with the time element and the various underfloors' explosions -- I saw them. Now that we know that WTC7 was demolished or "pulled" the likelihood that the towers were similarly "pulled" is even hightened. The anomoly that stands out to me concerning WTC2, is that it was hit with less destruction and obviously less heating by jet fuel and yet, was the first to fall. And I never meant to say or imply that either building fell faster than gravity. I think the term "freefall" refers to falling matter with no obstructions. This is what I meant. Faster than gravity is impossible -- thanks for thinking I would be that unintelligent!

Grimmer:

quote:
The internet has gained a reputation as a refuge of "conspiracy theorists," but recent events (e.g., the falsehoods told by US officials leading up to the Iraq war) have shown that "reputable" media are not to be trusted. They may themselves be regarded as purveyors of "official" conspiracy theories. This present paper hopes to achieve some level of objectivity about a very controversial subject.

I totally agree with this philosophy and his realization of the connotations of "conspiracy" and his reminder that indeed the official government story could in itself be termed a "conspiracy." His mistrust of the media I also share through repeated realizations of their complicity in promoting the administration's agenda, especially this administration. I also value his stated attempt at objectivity. And I value even more his statement, "Total objectivity is of course impossible. " and then his observations based on his own curiosity and subjective personal view:

a. reported spikes in seismic activity
b. near freefall times for collapse
c. pyroclastic clouds of debris
d. pools of molten steel found in basement
e. steel still warm after weeks

I would add to that the perfect footprint of the fall, the implosive kind of direction of the fall with no lateral motion or lateral falling of any part of the building, and the viewed squibs emanating below the site of immediate pressure and collapse.

For Grimmer, there was "no firm evidence of pre-collapse explosions that left seismic signatures." I can agree with that although other scientists claim there was a pre-collapse seismic reading. I could accept that the major seismic activity was created upon impact as it doesn't refute the thermite theory at all.

{QUOTE]The observed near free-fall times of the WTC towers (and WTC7) were a dramatic signature of a controlled demolition. (The articles at http://members.fortunecity.com/911 are a valuable resource for presenting and then challenging the "official" explanation for WTC collapses). [/QUOTE]

"Believing that there is nothing wrong with the towers collapsing so quickly, is roughly analogous to believing that people pass through closed doors as quickly as they pass through open doors." anonymous

The common sense aspects of the estimated 10 second collapse was enough for me to be suspicious and the other signatures of demolition only added to that.

quote:
A design procedure that will be used for structural framing of the 1,350-ft high twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City gives the exterior columns tremendous reserve strength. Live loads on these columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs.

http://members.fortunecity.com/911/wtc/eng-news-record.htm

Attesting to the strength of the floor loads I quote the engineering article written about the building of the WTC towers:

quote:
The procedure calls for proportioning of columns in each story for the same unit stress under gravity loads, regardless of the grade of steel in the columns. Thus, all columns will shorten the same amount, and differential shortening will be eliminated as a possible cause of floor warpage. The reserve strength of high strength steel members will then be available to resist wind stresses. http://members.fortunecity.com/911/wtc/eng-news-record.htm


quote:
The steel superstructure rising from the continuous foundations will contain steels of four basic stress grades A36 (36,000psi yield strength), A441 (50,000-psi yield strength), high-strength steel (65,000-psi yield strength) and heat-treated constructional alloy steel (100,000-psi yield strength).

The exterior walls will comprise giant Vierendeel trusses, designed to act like huge cantilevered hollow tubes. They will be pre-assembled in units two stories high and about 10 ft wide, spliced at mid-height of the columns and midspan of the deep spandrel beams. The closely spaced columns will consist of 14-inch-sq hollow box sections, providing high torsional and bending resistance.

Architects are Minoru Yamasaki & Associates of Birmingham, Mich., and Emery Roth & Sons, of New York City. Structural engineers are Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson, of Seattle.


All quotes above from the same article above. This all points to the likelihood and relevance of the strength of the lower portions of both buildings which were not heated. One floor obviously could not cause a pancaking collapse knowing the 2,000 percent strength above mentioned.

Grimmer:

quote:
...why is it that no video of either of the WTC collapses shows any sign of stutter between floor collapses, which should have been very apparent especially in the first few floors of collapse when the speed of gravitational collapse was small?

Yeah, just common sense!

Grimmer refutes and criticizes the MIT initial estimation of 30% and he even asked Letxa to cut it in half!

quote:
Consider also that apologists for the official conspiracy theory propose that 30% of the gravitational collapse energy was necessary to create the pyroclastic cloud of debris: that is, in their own analysis, this energy came out of the gravitational energy. This means that the time of fall would have been slowed further than what was observed.

He then disproved this mathematically and said it would have taken 12 seconds if the 30% figure was used.

Grimmer:

quote:
M. Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com and others have proposed the use of thermite, familiar to those of us who had the high school chemistry course with an impressive thermite demonstration. So the question arises: can one get enough thermite close enough to melt sections of the inner core columns, as part of a controlled demolition scenario? The following calculations in this paper indeed do show that it is possible (and I stress possible).

So the rest of his paper confirms his hypothesis that thermite could have been used and he stresses COULD HAVE BEEN. As I said before, it is a hypothesis of possibility.

You know, I've already said I don't know advanced math and forgot all of algebra II, but why would a physics, and Grimmer is a physics PhD, not just in solar, be suspect of using improper math? Just because he's part of a solar energy company does not mean he's ignorant to basic physics and the related physics math!

I've already stated why I disagree with the pancaking theory offered by Bazant. I have just pointed out the strong areas and areas of agreement with Grimmer.

Other evidence leads me to support the theory of demolition as I've stated many times in this thread! How many times do I have to say it, people?

Time of collapse

Explosions heard by witnesses

Small fires not evenly expanded over floors

Molten steel

WTC7 pulled -- same owner

Squibs visible below collapse line

Photos of explosions on certain floors

Perfect character of collapse with no lateral movement

Total crumbling of steel and concrete -- more powder and clouds than usual unassisted collapses or collapses due to fire

Would be more rubble if explosions weren't involved

People could escape through stairways and lower floors were not heated

Structural steel in lower floors was not heated or disturbed.

Strength of steel was greater than what MIT claimed and strength of floors as well-- especially on lower floors. No way could one or even two floors collapsing cause the whole building to pancake!!!

That's it, that's all I have to say and I've repeated myself enough! You add all the political stuff, the Port Authority, FEMA, and Silverstein and the evidence has mounted on the side of demolition and that is that! Perhaps they knew in advance, perhaps they didn't, but the buildings of WTC towers I and II were pulled!

bc


IP Logged

Wolf_Larson
Senior Member


The Sea
348 posts, Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2004 05:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wolf_Larson   Visit Wolf_Larson's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Boomer Chick:
Can't explosives be fireproofed externally and then just detonated when needed? It seems that sufficient detonation would be required and that the explosives themselves would NOT be subject to heat as their detonating process.

Even fireproofing has its limits. If you have a fire burning inside a building for over 7 hours, not much is going to survive. Again, I have to point out that these charges are not quiet. There were enough cameras and witnesses around that any charges would have been noticed and remarked upon.

This still presupposes that the charges were preset. Again, I have a lot of problems accepting this scenario. Furthermore, this also requires that the NYFD knew about those charges in advance.

quote:

"Pull" is a common term used in demolition, not in firefighting!



Can you back this statement up? Do you have personal experience in this regard? Are you a fire fighter? Are you a NYFD employee? Do you work for one of the explosive demolition companies?

If not, then I put forth that my interpretation of the use of the term pull in this regard is the correct one.

The fire chief told Silverstein that they were going to pull back and let the fire burn. This is consistent with all other reports of the activities that day.

IP Logged

shatoga
Agent Provocateur


963 posts, Nov 2002

posted 02-09-2004 07:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shatoga     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wolf_Larson:

Can you back this statement up?

Well, wolfie,
I have a mere thirty years of employment in the fire protection industry.
Only twenty of those years that Union Business managers and company Supervisors rated me one of the top ten nationwide.
Having trained several fire departments' personel regards fire protection suppression systems...
leaves me unimpressed with their credentials.
I have known many fire Department personnel as close personal friends.


They are fine decent people who want to save lives and buildings.
I taught many of them how to save lives.
And always told them "the building is unimportant".


IP Logged

shatoga
Agent Provocateur


963 posts, Nov 2002

posted 02-09-2004 07:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shatoga     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wolf_Larson:
Again, I have to point out that these charges are not quiet.


I can attest that I have used explosives, for excavation purposes, in several of our nation's major cities.

black powder got me ignored most often
and anfo also softened ground for later use of a backhoe.

Given to 'Bush arab conspiracy' theorists:
The use of explosives is not quiet.
It is, however, quieter than the sound of falling debris, or crashing airplanes.

I could demolish a house next to a city hall complex, and nobody ever suspect it was a controlled demolition.
Your tax money paid to teach me how.
The military W deserted from taught tens of thousands of us how.
Sirens and loudspeakers capture the attention of civilians while flsc's cut supports.

Same as it ever was.

W wanted a reason to invade iraq
it was manufactured on 911



[Edited 1 times, lastly by shatoga on 02-09-2004]

IP Logged

Wolf_Larson
Senior Member


The Sea
348 posts, Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2004 08:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wolf_Larson   Visit Wolf_Larson's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by shatoga:
Well, wolfie,
I have a mere thirty years of employment in the fire protection industry.
Only twenty of those years that Union Business managers and company Supervisors rated me one of the top ten nationwide.
Having trained several fire departments' personel regards fire protection suppression systems...
leaves me unimpressed with their credentials.
I have known many fire Department personnel as close personal friends.


They are fine decent people who want to save lives and buildings.
I taught many of them how to save lives.
And always told them "the building is unimportant".



And what do these close personal friends think of your belief that the WTC towers were a inside demolition job?

Do you also believe that the NYFD top brass are the ones who set off the explosives?

IP Logged

Boomer Chick
Senior Member


Colorado
608 posts, Sep 2003

posted 02-09-2004 08:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Boomer Chick     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
While I was investigating I came upon this site of civil engineers and their connection to the government.

Notice how NASA and the Air Force are shoving their tentacles and funding various private sector companies in Ohio. Ohio Society of Professional Engineers
http://www.ohioengineer.com/newsletters/OhioEngineerMagazine.htm

More later!

Oh! I already wrote my blog on the WTC demolition -- its' done, buddy! This is where I stand!

bc

------------------

IP Logged

shatoga
Agent Provocateur


963 posts, Nov 2002

posted 02-09-2004 08:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shatoga     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Boomer Chick:
While I was investigating I came upon this site of civil engineers and their connection to the government.

Notice how NASA and the Air Force are shoving their tentacles and funding various private sector companies in Ohio. Ohio Society of Professional Engineers
http://www.ohioengineer.com/newsletters/OhioEngineerMagazine.htm

More later!

Oh! I already wrote my blog on the WTC demolition -- its' done, buddy! This is where I stand!

bc


Link which has relevance.
IMHO
(In my professional opinion also)

Anyone who does not visit and read at that link should refrain from posting in this thread.

IP Logged

shatoga
Agent Provocateur


963 posts, Nov 2002

posted 02-09-2004 08:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shatoga     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wolf_Larson:

And what do these close personal friends think of your belief that the WTC towers were a inside demolition job?


Those who still communicate accept the concept of limiting losses.
Most are afraid to communicate with me, or anyt other critic of the bush regime.
(so many have died who opposed Bush, that they are afraid)

quote:
Originally posted by Wolf_Larson:

Do you also believe that the NYFD top brass are the ones who set off the explosives?


the top brass are the soulless politicoes in any government.
Lower level brass still have a connect with their men and women
and would not sacrifice lives so callously as the NYFD did (for Bush's Operation Northwoods/as bogus reason to invade Iraq) on 911.

IP Logged

Wolf_Larson
Senior Member


The Sea
348 posts, Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2004 08:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wolf_Larson   Visit Wolf_Larson's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
B.C. Back in the other thread I proposed a scenario where as the building collapsed, the structural distortions and pressure wave produced the collapsing structure preceded the actual point at which the top of the building was falling. I was much gratified to see this that at a lecturer at the University of Sidney, Department of Civil Engineering was thinking along the same lines.
http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/latest/wtc.php

quote:
The gigantic impact forces caused by the huge mass of the falling structure landing on the floors below travelled down the columns like a shockwave faster than the entire structure fell. The clouds of debris coming from the tower, several storeys below the huge falling mass, probably result from the sudden and almost explosive failure of each floor, caused by the "shockwave".

On another site (sorry lost the link will post it when I find it) , the collapse mechanism was likened to the collapse of a telescope. As the collapse progressed, each of the floors broke free from the perimeter walls and fell downward inside the structure, the perimeter walls peeled back, broke off at the column splices and fell outward.

This makes sense when you consider the structure of the towers. The perimeter columns carried the majority of the load bearing strength. The floors were attached to the perimeter columns by thin, flexible clip angles. Once the top started to drop, it was these clip angles that bore the brunt of the falling debris, not the exterior walls. Therefore the estimate of 30% of the energy being expended in breaking each floor loose is probably an over estimate of at least an order of magnitude.

IP Logged

Wolf_Larson
Senior Member


The Sea
348 posts, Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2004 09:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wolf_Larson   Visit Wolf_Larson's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by shatoga:

the top brass are the soulless politicoes in any government.

So who pushed the button, the Mayor? The Fire Chief?

IP Logged

Wolf_Larson
Senior Member


The Sea
348 posts, Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2004 09:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wolf_Larson   Visit Wolf_Larson's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Boomer Chick:
While I was investigating I came upon this site of civil engineers and their connection to the government.

Notice how NASA and the Air Force are shoving their tentacles and funding various private sector companies in Ohio. Ohio Society of Professional Engineers
http://www.ohioengineer.com/newsletters/OhioEngineerMagazine.htm

More later!

Oh! I already wrote my blog on the WTC demolition -- its' done, buddy! This is where I stand!

bc



Asbestos abatement projects and technology transfer?


LOL

nice try

A lot of firms do government work. One of my bigest clients is a local government agency. So what.


IP Logged

shatoga
Agent Provocateur


963 posts, Nov 2002

posted 02-09-2004 09:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for shatoga     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wolf_Larson:
As the collapse progressed, each of the floors broke free from the perimeter walls and fell downward inside the structure, the perimeter walls peeled back, broke off at the column splices and fell outward.

On 911,
The perimeter walls peeled back and fell inward.

As only happens in a controlled explosive demolition.


Thanks wolfie,
for helping make the case that the 911 collapse was a controlled demoliotion.

My respect that you posted some truths despite the "RNC prohibition.
Your bravery should be recognized.
RNC kills many who oppose them.

IP Logged

Wolf_Larson
Senior Member


The Sea
348 posts, Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2004 09:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wolf_Larson   Visit Wolf_Larson's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by shatoga:
On 911,
The perimeter walls peeled back and fell inward.

As only happens in a controlled explosive demolition.



I’ll bet that you scored real low on the reading comprehension test in H.S.

As the interior floors broke free, the perimeter walls were no longer braced or anchored in place. They peeled back and fell outward

But please tell me how this "only happens in a controlled explosive demolition(s)? "

How many uncontrolled collapses of 100 story buildings are you comparing this to?


IP Logged

letxa2000
Senior Member


U.S. citizen in Mexico
327 posts, Dec 2003

posted 02-09-2004 09:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for letxa2000     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by shatoga:
On 911, the perimeter walls peeled back and fell inward. As only happens in a controlled explosive demolition.

You're kidding right?

Demolition is just the strategic placement of explosions to let gravity do its work.

Emergency.com discusses the various types of building collapses and classifies them as either implosions or explosions. It reads "With implosion, the building will collapse into itself. It is a technique that is used by demolition specialists to minimize the spread of debris when purposely demolishing buildings. This type of collapse is likely to be caused when interior weight bearing structures lose their integrity and subsequently "pull" exterior walls into the center of the mass." Regarding explosion, it reads "In the case of explosion, either caused by an outward rush of force caused by natural, mechanical, or chemical forces, the building will collapse in an "outward" direction. It is likely that the debris will be more wide spread in the vicinity of the collapse, and that it could be of lesser density and depth. A tornado or hurricane can "scatter" building parts for several hundred feet or even farther, when it causes a building(s) to collapse."

The above is from an Emergency site that talks about rescue. I wouldn't expect that many rescues to happen during a demolition which means implosions represent a number of normal building collapses.

In this collapse (also covered here) in Cairo on January 27th, the 11-story building apparently collapsed accordion--style upon itself. There was no report of neighboring buildings being damaged and pictures suggest they weren't. No indication of demolition, though there was an ajacent fire.

So I assume you are joking if you think that the above "only happens in a controlled explosive demolition."

IP Logged

Boomer Chick
Senior Member


Colorado
608 posts, Sep 2003

posted 02-09-2004 10:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Boomer Chick     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by shatoga:
Link which has relevance.
IMHO
(In my professional opinion also)

Anyone who does not visit and read at that link should refrain from posting in this thread.


Glad you noticed, shatoga! NASA and the Air Force with many projects and grants, their fingers in the civil pie, was quite shocking to me! I didn't expect it at all!
http://www.ohioengineer.com/newsletters/OhioEngineerMagazine.htm

Wright Technology Network Is a Valuable Resource for Ohio Engineers

The Ohio Department of Development has asked the Wright Technology Network (WTN) to focus technology commercialization from federal laboratories to Ohio businesses.

A chief interest of WTN is to grow Ohio industry awareness of business and technology opportunities with federal laboratories. WTN has helped many companies take advantage of these opportunities to develop new processes and products, and to improve existing ones.

WTN collaborates with many federal laboratories, including the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB) in Dayton and NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) at Lewis Field in Cleveland.

AIR FORCE CONNECTION
AFRL is WTN’s principal source of innovative technologies and expertise. WTN services include traditional technology transfer programs such as Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) and Technical Assistance. Commercialization Projects, Education Outreach, High Performance Computing and Modeling and Simulation are also WTN technology transfer programs of growing importance to the Air Force.

WTN was originally formed, as a not-for-profit corporation, in 1989 by leaders from Wright-Patterson AFB and the State of Ohio to help companies and universities gain access to Air Force expertise, facilities, and technology at WPAFB. Over the years WTN’s relationship with AFRL has grown substantially and has been formalized in a Partnership Intermediary Agreement (PIA) with the five AFRL technology directorates located at WPAFB. These include Human Effectiveness, Materials and Manufacturing, Propulsion, Sensors, and Air Vehicles. For these five directorates, the PIA provides WTN the legal authority to seek out industry partners and match the needs of businesses to an extensive variety of AFRL technologies. Major commercial industries impacted by AFRL technologies include: aerospace, automotive, biotechnology, chemical, construction, electronics, environmental, information technology, materials, medical, modeling & simulation, polymers, recreation, and transportation.

As Partnership Intermediary with the AFRL technology directorates at WPAFB, WTN has the privilege of reviewing and evaluating cutting edge technologies being developed by these world-class research organizations. At the request of the technology directorates, WTN has evaluated many technologies for their commercialization potential. The WTN website (www.wtn.org) provides a brief description of only those technologies that have passed through the AFRL-WTN screening process. These technologies are considered ready for commercialization. (Visit www.wtn.org often; technology evaluations are conducted frequently and new technologies appear regularly.)

In a few cases, the AFRL technology described has already been licensed to a vendor and these are shown to provide businesses with a source for a high tech product or process developed by the Air Force. In all cases WTN has evaluated the technology’s maturity and its market potential. Typically, this information is also available from the WTN website. Examples of several AFRL technologies that could be licensed for commercialization include:

• Biaxial Testing Apparatus – used in tension/compression load cell for testing along two axes. The biaxial testing apparatus will be useful in the testing of non-metallic materials including pressure vessels, storage tanks, and composite aircraft structures. The biaxial testing apparatus might also be a means for measuring biaxial composite failure criteria or in approving new materials for structural use. The device may also be used to examine biaxial stresses on lap joints and boltholes specifically in non-uniform materials.

• Microtubes - can have application in the following market sectors: optics, electronics, medical devices, and microelectromechanical devices (MEMS). They can be made from essentially any material with precisely controlled composition, diameter and wall thickness. Tubes have been made from metals, ceramics, glass, polymers, alloys, and also some layered combinations and can be made in sizes from 5 nanometers to 1000 microns inside diameter. Specific applications include: chromatography, encapsulation, injectors, micropipettes, dies, heat pipes, sensors, and detectors.

• Micro/miniature heat pipes – can be used to cool many electronic components, and, because of their small size, are particularly suited to portable devices such as small, laptop computers. Low cost mass production of micro miniature heat pipes should be possible.

• Remote Control Structural Exciter - provides calibration technique for structural systems. This new technique allows one person to perform multiple end-to-end mechanical calibrations of structural dynamics measurement systems. An end-to-end calibration means a full calibration of instrumentation from the physical input to the transducer to the output where the analog or digital signal is normally analyzed. The technique uses remote control structural exciters to stimulate measurement transducers, contained in structures, with a measurable input level and an output signal communicated to a data recorder.

NASA CONNECTION
WTN is collaborating with the Great Lakes Industrial Technology Center (GLITeC) in a NASA Glenn Research Center initiative. In 1997, the National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA), Congressman Louis Stokes, and the Great Lakes Industrial Technology Center (GLITeC) made a commitment to foster greater participation by small, minority-owned, and women-owned businesses in key NASA programs. That commitment resulted in NASA Glenn’s Garrett Morgan Commercialization Initiative (GMCI). The initiative provides services that enable companies to grow or strengthen their business by leveraging NASA programs, technology, and expertise. GLITeC, in Cleveland, Ohio, is responsible for implementing GMCI in the six Great Lakes states (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin). Battelle Memorial Institute, the world’s largest private research and development organization, operates GLITeC.

Companies selected for the program are primarily located in one of the Great Lakes States. The companies are technology-driven, or have manufacturing operations that can benefit from NASA resources, and are stable and on the threshold of success. The Garrett Morgan Commercialization Initiative is unique in its customized approach to providing critical technology and business services that link companies with NASA technology and other support resources.

Through this program companies can:

• Acquire NASA technology to develop new products or processes, or improve current products or processes.

• Obtain the technical expertise they need to help turn NASA technology into a new product or technical solution.

• Obtain the insight of successful business executives.

• Fill gaps in their business operation by collaborating with others.

• Strengthen the commercialization plan of their Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II proposal.

• Investigate NASA programs and procurement opportunities.

• Receive marketing assistance for a product based on NASA technology.

Participation in this project is at no cost to the company. In addition, each year a limited number of companies receive cash commercialization awards to help with marketing and/or development. NASA Glenn technology areas focus on: biomedical, advanced materials, advanced communications, advanced manufacturing, sensors, electronics, and turbo machinery.

WTN is partnered with GLITeC to implement GMCI in southwest Ohio (Cincinnati, Columbus and Dayton region). WTN assists companies that have the ability to commercialize a technology - either an existing NASA technology or by using NASA expertise to improve a product that the company is developing. SBIR’s are a good indication of a potential fit for the program. WTN looks for companies that are:

• Small businesses/small disadvantaged businesses and located in Southwestern Ohio,

• Strategically positioned for success and have a product, service or technology capability of interest to NASA in the research, computer or manufacturing area,

• Interested in commercialization and have a high potential for success, and

• Are highly motivated and committed to the Garrett Morgan Commercialization Initiative.

Some of the current NASA Glenn technologies available for commercialization include:

• Capacitive Extensometer - capable of measuring extremely small and rapid movement in three directions simultaneously. Potential applications include strain measurement - aerospace, civil and structural engineering, construction, medical devices, destructive analysis, seismology, oil exploration, or any application where the degree of bending is desired to be measured.

• Atomic oxygen - used as a method of cleaning and altering the surface of organic materials. Potential applications include artwork restoration, textured polymer surfaces for cell culturing and adhesion to biomedical implants, surface sterilization and/or cleaning.

• Thin film and coating technologies - provide unique mechanical, electrical, optical, biomedical and/or chemical properties. Potential applications include food and medical packaging, abrasion resistance, corrosion resistance, antimicrobial surfaces, water repellant surfaces, dry film lubrication, anti-fogging surfaces, and controlled surface conductivity.

• Safe fuels -safer, denser propellants leading to better overall performance. Gelled fuels, gellants, mixing techniques, nanoparticle aluminum, and metallized gelled fuels. Potential applications include paint additives and reflective surfaces, racing fuel additives, particle formation, cryogenic coolers and storage systems, and slurry flows for coal.

• Diamond-like carbon coatings - effective, self-lubricating and wear-resistant coatings. Potential applications include barriers in mechanical assemblies, solid-film lubricants for ceramics and polymers, cost-effective high performance coatings, semiconductor and thermal management applications, biomedical implants, MEMS and disk drives.

• DNA technologies - electrically determining the characteristics of individual DNA strands non-destructively. Determine the exact length of the DNA strand and characterize exact locations. Potential applications include genomics, gene therapy research, bioinformatics, and other studies of DNA in all living organisms, creating electrical interfaces to individual DNA strands, or attempting to use DNA to construct computation systems.

These technologies are part of a larger portfolio of items available for commercialization. While GMCI is a technology transfer initiative, it also specializes in providing the customized "capacity-building" services listed earlier, as well as "critical funds" that help move products into the marketplace.

Information on AFRL and WTN can be found at www.wtn.org. For details on the Garrett Morgan Commercialization Initiative as well as additional NASA technologies, go to www.nasagmci.org.

______________________

Implications abound!

Thimpk!

bc

------------------

IP Logged

Wolf_Larson
Senior Member


The Sea
348 posts, Aug 2003

posted 02-09-2004 10:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wolf_Larson   Visit Wolf_Larson's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
B.C. are you impying that there is something evil about all of this?

IP Logged

letxa2000
Senior Member


U.S. citizen in Mexico
327 posts, Dec 2003

posted 02-10-2004 12:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for letxa2000     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wolf_Larson:
B.C. are you impying that there is something evil about all of this?

If we not only count everyone who has ever done business with the military but also count those that have taken a tour of NASA then we can just about make the case that everyone is implicated! Oh my....

IP Logged

Boomer Chick
Senior Member


Colorado
608 posts, Sep 2003

posted 02-11-2004 01:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Boomer Chick     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Black and white thinking is an "either or" construct-- assuming evil or assuming only good, and cannot be termed lateral thinking. Since I posted an excellent reasoning post day before yesterday when the power went out in my forest -- I'll just say this:

Ethics! Technology can be used for wonderful humane purposes, exploration, and edification for the general welfare and improved living quality for all people. But when you combine government entities with private sector R & D, with the information flow back forth, the possibilities for unethical use of various R & D projects increases. This is common sense and also a learned experience from the past in light of covert government/ science experimentation in the past.

Since the hierarchy of government entities involves secrecy from level to level, the bottom level of scientists do not fully know the ultimate purpose for any of their discoveries. Some will be of course used for private sector projects, medical establishment, educational, etc., but considering the governmental connections to DOD and related government agencies, there's no guarantee that ultimately various patents and discoveries will NOT be used for weaponry and other secretive projects. No guarantee at all when the government extends its information and funding tentacles into private sector science research.

Another point to consider, is the informational overcontrol and surveillance opportunities of the government over these private sector multi-area engineering R & D projects with the opposite and equal surveillance power into the government research agnecies simply not existing for the private sector. Of course there will be some interplay and exchange that's equal, but at the higher levels involving ultimate usages, patents, and ownership of said discoveries, once the government is involved it becomes an overarching control situation government over====> private. Ethics, humane usage, profit for whom and why, and secrecy then comes into play. When a scientist's livelihood and a private engineering firm's contracts are government funded, independence and ultimate usage of such technology is intricately connected and controlled by the government and its agendas many of which are kept secret and many of which are not.

The implications are tremendous and a double edged sword, so to speak -- one edge for great benefits for humanity and other for great destruction and possible usages for controlling of populations and benefitting those corporations and government entities who may unethically use the technologies. Therefore, the more the government extends its tentacles the less control the private enterprises have in the captalistic flow of information and sharing world wide and nationally. Just common sense. The interplay and tension, just like the democratic principle of checks and balances in government between private sector and government is necessary to preserve freedom and ethics within the technology arena.

http://www.rense.com/general47/pulled.htm

WTC 7 'Pulled' By Silverstein,
FDNY - Were Towers
'Pulled' Too?
From Judy Singer
Las Vegas
1-18-4


Does this suggest pre-positioned explosives in the Towers?


Hi Jeff - While surfing the net, I came across this information as shown below. It appears that the WTC Center buildings had 'been pulled' which is why the World Trade Center buildings collapsed.

I heard Mr. Silverstein's admissions on my computer audio file. There have been so many conflicting reports. However, I do believe this report substantiates why the WTC buildings finally collapsed, as sad as it is!

PBS Documentary: Silverstein, FDNY Razed WTC 7

By Jeremy Baker

In a stunning and belated development concerning the attacks of 9/11 Larry Silverstein, the controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated plainly in a PBS documentary that he and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish the Solomon Bros. building, or WTC 7, late in the afternoon of Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001.

This admission appeared in a PBS documentary originally aired in Sept. of 2002 entitled "America Rebuilds". Mr Silverstein's comments came after FEMA and the Society of Civil Engineers conducted an extensive and costly investigation into the curious collapse of WTC 7. The study specifically concluded that the building had collapsed as a result of the inferno within, sparked, apparently, by debris falling from the crumbling North Tower.

In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement;

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

[This can be heard in the audio file http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3. Thanks to Sir Dave 'tmo' Soule for transfering this from the video to an MP3 file. "America Rebuilds", PBS Home Video, ISBN 0-7806-4006-3, is available from http://shop.pbs.org/products/AREB901/.]

Mr. Silverstein's comments stand in direct contradiction to the findings of the extensive FEMA report. They even negate Kevin Spacey's narrative in the very documentary in which they appear; "WTC 7 fell after burning for 7 hours." If it had been generally known that the building was "pulled" wouldn't Mr. Spacey have phrased it that way?

In the same program a cleanup worker referred to the demolition of WTC 6: "... we're getting ready to pull the building six." There can be little doubt as to how the word "pull" is being used in this context.

[This can be heard in the audio file http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt2.mp3 taken from the video.]

This shocking contradiction is yet another curious twist in a disturbing series of events surrounding the "collapse" of WTC 7, and the WTC complex in general.

Among these is the fact that, in all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever resulted in a collapse. On 9/11 three such anomalies were alleged to have occurred. Those who argue that the towers were vulnerable in their top-heaviness and verticality cannot then explain the collapse due to fire of WTC 7, a broad based, 47-story steel-framed building.

There is also the fact that most of the structures destroyed by falling debris were directly under the twin towers, and none of them caught fire. WTC 7 was not only a full city block away from Tower 1 but WTC 6 stood directly between the two buildings and certainly absorbed most of the damage.

In addition, WTC 7 suffered a strangely thorough and complete collapse, leaving only a leveled lot where it once stood. Although it was a much smaller structure, WTC 6's 8-story carcass stood for months afterwards, even after being gutted by Tower 1.

There's also disturbing correlations between the collapse of WTC 7 and the bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City. Both buildings were constructed using the same bridge beam system that, in WTC 7's case, allegedly contributed to its demise. But more importantly WTC 7, like the Murrah building, housed high-level government offices including the FBI, CIA and the Secret Service. WTC 7 was also the storage facility for millions of files pertaining to active cases involving international drug dealing, organized crime, terrorism and money laundering.

WTC 6, also known as the Customs House building, housed the Departments of Commerce, Agriculture and Labor and yet another Murrah building tenant, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

WTC 7 was also the location of a kind of a doomsday bunker (a $15 million project of Rudy Giuliani's), a command post from which to operate in case of a total infrastructure breakdown. Building 7 had apparently been bullet proofed and reinforced to withstand hurricane force winds and attacks of all kinds, a fact which makes its alleged fatal vulnerability to falling debris all the more puzzling.

Mr. Silverstein's comments imply that he and the FDNY threw together an expert demolition job in the space of a few short hours on the afternoon of 9/11. This revelation is staggering enough considering its blatant contradiction to what has been, all along, the official cause of the "collapse." But the fact that the building was buried under tons of debris and consumed in flames at the time makes his comments all the more baffling.

There's a compelling theory that bombs had been planted inside the twin towers designed to complete the job the hijacked jets had begun. A handful of seasoned professional firefighters and demolition men have commented on how neatly and evenly the towers collapsed. Mr. Silverstein's bewildering statements in "America Rebuilds" give an exponential boost in credence to this claim and, in a more terrifying light, loan credibility to growing suspicions that the attacks of 9/11 may have been an inside job.
http://www.epilot.com/sdspartners/searchpage_bluedesign.asp?affid=bravenet


Comment
From Tom Gordon
Systems Engineer
11-19-4

World Trade Center 'Bombing,'
An Unwitting Participant Asks; "WHY?"

_____________

In 1988, I moved to NYC., seeking architectural photography assignments from various key architects. Before moving there, I asked for help from my prior clients in Denver. One good friend and close ally, Herb Roth, suggested I contact his friends at "Emery-Roth Architects," (No relation) After the usual portfolio review and pricing discussions, Barry Roth, AIA, asked me to cover the "World Trade Center." This assignment, I thought, would be one of the greatest opportunities of my career!

It was widely known that "Ezra Stoller and Associates" and "Norman McGrath" had laboriously photographed the World Trade Center for a period of over one year. They created some of the finest known images of the towers, the most memorable ones are at twilight, with the Statue of Liberty in the foreground. They informed me that Ezra had actually photographed it routinely for something like 6 years.

I was allowed to analyze the firm's existing 'photo files' before I began my coverage. I asked a lot of questions which is how I learned most of the background information I'm about to cover. The 'librarian' at Emery's offices was actually the main corporate secretary, who's demeanor was more like someone you would expect to work under at the Metropolitan Museum, -totally reserved and humorless. This was my first challenge, and frankly a cause for alarm.

Not long after the buildings were built, the WTC owners retained the architect of record, and their photographer, and several principal engineers from the original consulting firm- "to establish the safety of the twin towers." Each of their staff members worked on this project on a 'full-time' contract basis, most of them for a period of about 10 years. By 1989, it was very late in the process, but there were still about 15 current participants involved in all. (I found all these 'facts' to be highly unusual, but perhaps simply beyond my 10+ years experience-level.)

My assignment was to: "apply my Julius Schulman -technique," to photograph both of the towers in their contextual situation. "Not just the buildings, but especially how they 'fit' with the neighborhood.

After a month and a half, I had exhausted my interest in the street vantage-points, so I decided to go up in the towers early one morning, to see which adjacent rooftops could offer the most suitable additional views. It was still too cold to shoot those views. This was between May 9th and May 13, 1989.

Carrying just my light-weight 35mm gear, I was singled-out from the regular building patrons by the lobby guards, which totally surprised me. I explained the nature of my business with a moderate degree of assurance, but was shocked when they reacted as though I had been expected, very matter-of-factly!. One of them phoned upstairs, while another insisted he was sending a guard with me, "to insure that I would arrive at the engineering office in time for our meeting." The suite was labeled: Skilling & Jackson, P.C.. -whom I had knowledge of, but no prior relations with.

Had this been the leasing office, I would have understood the mix-up perfectly. Clearly, this was NOT a situation that could pertain to me in any way. I was not aware that Roth had an office in the building at all, but, like a true 'rookie,' I was feeling keen to discuss my abilities with their 'big guns,' since any contact with such people here could have lead me to major future assignments!

When we arrived at the door to this suite, I was 'very shocked' to see the actual sign on their 'main office door.' The door and jamb itself were of completly service-grade materials, like an ordinary 'back door' at any other suite. The sign was brand new and simply said: Skilling Associates, P.C.. (This was a small engraved laminated sign from an ordinary office supply store.) I thought to myself: Humm, these people have been here over 10 years?

"Everyone sit down and be quiet." "Who's this?," the orator said loudly, starring at me. I said: "I 'm the official photographer from Roth."

{...like who are you and what's it to you buddy, haven't you heard of me? }

Unflinching, somber and businesslike, he said without drawing a breath:

Then, you are to be included, who sent you here?

I said; "Barry Roth- I just got a message from his secretary."

(Which was almost completely true, but she hadn't called about this, to my knowledge! )

He nodded and addressed the full group, then reading from a 4x5 file-card, acknowledged some absentee members and confirmed their knowledge and prior 'agreements of compliance.' He said to the few of us in this special group:

"Listen carefully, nobody gets out of this!"

"Each of you were called here to sign an affidavit of non-disclosure. None of the information from our project can find it's way into the public-eye. Absolutely nothing that we have learned from this project can be revealed to the public because it is potentially damaging to our client. Some of you have enjoyed 10 years of service on this project for our client. Each of the team leaders have recently received raises and additional benefits. { someone } -has already received a new assignment and he will be getting a healthy raise at his new location, {undisclosed}."

"I know this transition will take you by surprise, but there was no other way to handle it. You are all terminated from this project effective immediately! This means you need to clear your desks and surrender all of your files by the end of the day.

I will assist you in getting these papers into the archive cabinets so we can give them to the owners for safekeeping."

"After you have signed these forms, we will have a short recess. You may go to the Cafe, or to 'Windows' for lunch, but don't leave the buildings! I want you all to know that I am sad to have to break this news. Your work will not go unnoticed, each of you has provided an invaluable service and we are all grateful. Do not think that this action shows any reflection on the exceptional quality of your individual work!"

This was like a military operation, yet no one in the room knew I didn't work for their firm!

So, we went to "lunch," at around 10:15am. where I was able to visit with 3, or 4 of the lesser engineers, without oversight from their 'head honchos.' I played it really cool considering my total ignorance. Each of them were furious. I said things like -"Shame we have to dis-band, I was looking forward to being here for at least a few months." "What do you suppose we've done wrong?" ...Each in turn revealed:

"The fact is, we all know that the buildings can't stand safely for over 40 to 60 years. It's not the sub-soil, that's granite. They must have received the completed demolition report, which we all knew to expect. It was supposed to be finished months ago. Clearly it looks bad. Well, I'm sure we all know the real implication- that the owners can't get their money back. That's what we all learned today. -Thanks _X_, f*** you!"

I asked: -"Why, what do you mean?"

It will cost $____ Billion to erect the two scaffolds to surround both buildings, that's the only known way to take these baby's down. We'll literally have to re-build them, then un-build them, twice! Now it's obvious, bottom-line is that the developer will have to sell them soon, or take a serious bath. (I forget the actual figure)

-"Why are they worried now? They still seem really stable architecturally."

They are much too big. It's a piece-by-piece problem. They simply can't be imploded, we know of no other way. Why do you think they hired me for 10 years to find other solutions? I'm not a structural specialist, just an architect!

- "I thought Barry said you guys were about to find a solution."

(I could see that was the wrong thing to say.) A slight look of concern spread over their faces, until I said-"What's a few more Flying Buttresses going to cost?" It was a lame jab, but they bought it and everyone relaxed as I pretended to be contemplating my next job interview.

I learned that 'none of them were allowed to be holding other jobs,' as long as they held these 'titles,' a contract-stipulation had occurred at least 4 years prior. They all griped about the "pathetic" lunch; "This is horrible, I can't eat here!" No one was very relaxed. The more I learned, the more scared I was as I listened for more fascinating inside news.

-Finally, pushing my luck, I prodded again: "So tell me about the electrolytic issues."

Everyone went quiet, but realised they were in deep. They began a patent narritive which was clearly not about to go anywhere, since I think they knew that I knew as much as each of them about the composition and arrangements of these metals. I had effectively blown my cover.

Suddenly, just short of our hour, a man came to escort us back to their desks which had been mostly riffled through, or completely boxed and removed.

"Again, son, tell me who you are?" -One of the senior associates asked. "You guys walk ahead, he said, using firm body-lauguage to physically indicate that he would be in a position to restrain me at any time.

"I'm T.S. Gordon the official photographer. They were tired of paying Stoller." "Who's Stoller, I only know of McGrath?" "Are you saying you are not with Mr. McGrath's firm?"

I said; "Ezra Stoller, the world's greatest at shooting tall buildings. Haven't you seen all the great shots up at Emery Roth? McGrath has shot what, 6 or 8 great photos in 4 years!," (-I sarcastically mused, until I began to feel that he might arrest me. By the way, Norman's shot's were great too, but I felt I had to assert a strong opinion.)

"You go by; Tom, Thomas, or T.S.?" -He asked, looking again at my drivers license.

"TS- I was called in to cover the site, not just the buildings. I didn't even need to come in here again for my assignment!" - I said, carefully back-stepping, like I could find my way to the elevator. He grabbed my arm and we proceeded rapidly through the corridors behind the others. "No, you were called in because everyone had to sign off on their part in this entire assignment. You say you work for Barry__ who?"

I responded with the proper name and added, "He's the one that cuts my checks and I give him ALL the film." (An exaggeration, but I knew Barry was a former project manager and he would be at lunch if they tried to call.)

"You are not to tell anyone about your employment here, ever!" -he said.

"Wait here by the window, all of you with outside affiliations." A couple of guys took their seats by the North window, but I was nervous and I stood with my back to them as I starred down on the un-finished looking iron-work of building #7, which had just been 'topped-out' with a ceremony the day before.

"What are you studying?" someone asked. "I can't believe that building is so tall and skinny," and I really couldn't. ( I had toured #7, so I was quite curious about this viewing angle.) He stood up, evidently really angry, and said quite unpleasantly; "Yeah good old #7, the building that never should have been built!"


The room went silent. His tone was immediately received as a threat by the boss. He separated the three of us and called my contact at Emery-Roth who then acknowledged that I was hired to shoot the building. Neither discussed any details, so I was off the hook in a way. He dismissed me and said I was not to talk to any of the other participants on the way out, not ever again. An armed guard escorted me down to the street.

Within a few days I called Ezra Stoller, in White Plains, who, speaking about WTC, innocently revealed that he; "Wasn't allowed to shoot any more pictures of it." That was a very funny thing to hear him say. No one ever "doesn't allow" a photographer to get a better shot. I didn't say what had happened to me, only that it was very exciting for me to get to follow in his shoes. I thanked him for the friendly phone visit and promised to show him the prints if I got any really great shots. He was very polite and understood my admiration.

_____________

Based on a true life experience I had at the World Trade Center, I offer this document now, to those who may be searching for " key potential motives" behind the actions that led to the 9/11 attacks. I do not intend to imply that any of the parties that I will mention here were directly involved in the coordinated effort to destroy the building.

However, it is clearer to me, over time, that this information would have provided a pre-eminent, and utterly untraceable 'blue-print' to the group that finally engineered the 9/11 attack.

This document was originally released in 2003, and was ammended for accuracy, on: 1/18/2004.

This information is entirely true and this is its first public release. My explanation does not intend to add substantially in any way to the factual information that is contained in the actual documentation that I have described.-TSG


Supporting Facts, Assumptions and Curious Questions:

I would speculate that in 1989 through 1993, as the downtown real estate market was falling, there were perhaps reasons to suspect that the WTC owners might have contemplated the first bombing. After Battery Park attracted their biggest tenants, the property quickly lost it's viability. (At the time, Geoff Parker reported that a friend of his was given a whole floor in the South tower to use as a drumming studio, for free!) By 1996, the internet had decentralized the financial industry, further diminishing the lease/return opportunities of this property. ( I don't know the actual math, maybe it was going up again.)

The building cost about $1.5B to build and was worth about $4. to 5.B at its peak. But, it would have cost about $20B to un-build it in 2010 dollars, or as it neared its 1/2 'safe' life. Obviously it HAD to be imploded and there was never going to be a 'break-even' point for the owners.

The first attempted attack was evidently planned to kill all of us, or at least scatter the group's paperwork. Building #7 was actually a protective scaffold, designed to catch the debris as the North building fell. Why did they plan it so only this building would fall, particularly northward? Would they receive the insurance then appeal for a government bail-out to de-construct the main tower, sometime later?

Minoru Yamasaki was working for the Saudi's when he took on this project. After its completion in 1973, he returned to Saudi Arabia to consult on other projects. Eventually, in 1986, he did the Saudi Financial Center. Noteworthy, if I remember, because of its triangular super-rigid looking tower, also attributed to S.O.M. In interviews he appears to be a gracious and spiritually honest man. We certainly felt his pain when he was interviewed on TV.

Minoru befriended Richard Roth Sr., while working for Brown & Root in Chicago. Roth was noted for his contribution on the "Columbia Exposition" Project. They shared many arts & crafts stylistic attitudes. Richard Roth Jr. was in charge of his dad's firm when he retired. He is friends with lots of conservatives. (Carnegie Mellon group, like his dad.) He is friends with Saul Steinberg, Stephen Roth, Jeffrey Levine, lots of famous Jewish folks with dubious Israeli connections.

When the building was sold to Silversteen, Stephen Roth, (with Vernado Realty) worked to take the bid as high as possible, offering $750,M more than the next lower bidder. Did he even have the money? Two months before the official auction, he withdrew the ridiculous bid. Could this have been a mistake on his part?

Isn't this the same Stephen Roth who runs the "Anti-defamation League" in Israel. They track all persons who threaten the sovereignty of Israel. Interestingly enough it was established in 1991! Suddenly, after that, there were lots of reported 'neo-nazi' groups springing up in Germany and the UK. His group gave rise to the importance of stopping these 'Right- wing terrorists' at all costs, and he may serve as the eyes and ears for the CIA, or Massoud. Either way, he's got to be an insider with Sharon.

Tom-Scott Gordon
Architectural Photographer/currently A/V Systems Integrator
penmanchip@hotmail.com

Comment
From Tom-Scott Gordon
1-19-4

Hi Jeff -

You may remember the transcript that I sent you about a pre-existing 'demolition plan' for the Twin Trade Towers. I have been actively pursuing the development of that set of documents into a 'corroborated' story. I have received help from Michael @ From the Wilderness and Jeff King, another important 9-11 cover-up researcher. I think you should have one of them on your program immediately!

I would like for you to 'add this comment' to the end of your story, something that I believe to be just as important as Mr. Silverstein's 'smoking gun,' -itself. This appears in the context of my tedious narrative, and in some ways 'certifies,' these events. I will highlight the quote now, but my full story will not be ready to send to the commission for days.

It's more than a smoking gun. In my 25+ years exposure to all sorts of architects, I have never heard such a damaging comment as the one I'm about to tell you. Not to the design process, the people, nor the conflicts involved in achieving our profession's crowning achievements. It was like seeing a mother with her newborn child, as she quietly ends it's precious life!

"There I was, fantastically excited to be looking down on the steel framing, as Building #7 was finally 'topped out.' To my right, stood one of the project architects, who said; (then turned, and left the room without looking any of us in the eye): "Building seven. -The building that never should have been built."

-----------------------------

bc


IP Logged

Boomer Chick
Senior Member


Colorado
608 posts, Sep 2003

posted 02-11-2004 02:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Boomer Chick     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
PULL IT !

http://www.thewebfairy.com/911/pullit/index.htm

IP Logged

Boomer Chick
Senior Member


Colorado
608 posts, Sep 2003

posted 02-11-2004 02:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Boomer Chick     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Great website for 9/11 news and updates! New York based activist site. I don't know about their attitudes toward Kerry, but Mech could certainly relate!
http://www.911skeptics.blogspot.com/

IP Logged

swamp gas
Bird Man of Hudson County


Jersey City, NJ
1282 posts, May 2002

posted 02-11-2004 02:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for swamp gas     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks Boomer!

Any doubts now, Wolfie and Lexie?

IP Logged


This topic is 9 pages long:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7  8 9

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:







Site Meter

Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c