posted 04-15-2004 07:02 PM            

EVIDENCE: BOTH OF THE TOWERS FELL IN ABOUT 10 SECONDS.

PROOF:

All that one needs to know, to be able to conclusively prove that the Twin Towers were demolished, is that the towers fell in roughly 10 seconds, that is, that they fell at about the same rate that an object falls through air.

Anyone with a little common sense will realize that the top of a building does not pass through the concrete and steel that comprises the lower portion of the building at the same rate that it falls through air. This just doesn't happen, unless, of course, the lower part of the building has lost its structural integrity (and this is usually due to the detonation of a multitude of small explosive charges as seen in controlled demolitions).

The fact that the towers collapsed in about 10 seconds is a statement that the upper portion of each of the towers passed through the lower portion at about the same rate that it would have fallen through air. The fact that the towers fell this quickly (essentially at the rate of free-fall) is conclusive evidence that they were deliberately demolished.

Believing that there is nothing wrong with the towers collapsing so quickly, is roughly analogous to believing that people pass through closed doors as quickly as they pass through open doors.

The fact that they fell at such a rate means that they encountered essentially no resistance from the supposedly undamaged parts of the structure. That is, no resistance was encountered from any of the immensely strong parts of the structure that had held the building up for the last 30 years. From this one can conclude that the lower undamaged parts were actually very damaged (probably by the detonation of a multitude of small explosive charges as is usual in a controlled demolition).

posted 04-15-2004 07:23 PM            

The general consensus here agree that 9-11 was engineered by the people in the Bush administration and the CIA.

I'd say..I definately believe that explosives were involved and the planes were merely for "show".

A lot of us had an interesting discussion on it in this thread.

posted 04-15-2004 07:23 PM            

Thanks for posting, Awful Truth, and most of us have been discussing this and have all the links! We're glad you understand and know about the demolition theory!

If you read the threads on this page, you'll see that we have been discussing this for quite a long time!

Again, thanks, and next time try to find the threads and add to them, OK?

Thanks!

posted 06-21-2004 09:34 PM            

Nuff Said

p.s. Mech you misspelled "definitely" and wolf_larson you misspelled "unanimous".

You might both wish to try try hooked on phonics. Debunker or activist, you all seem blatantly uneducated...

posted 06-21-2004 10:35 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by silver-surfer:
p.s. Mech you mispelled "definitely" and wolf_larson you mispelled "unanimous".

You might both wish to try try hooked on phonics, debunker or activist, you all seem blatanly uneducated...

---

Wow! Are you kidding? Look at the errors you made in the short snip above:

1. P.S. should be capitalized.
2. You misspelled the word misspelled TWO times.
3. Wolf_Larson spells his screen name with a capital W and capital L.
4. Your second sentence would better read: You both might wish to try…
5. You wrote “try try” instead of try.
6. Hooked on Phonics is capitalized.
7. There should be a period after Phonics.
8. You misspelled blatantly.
9. Three periods at the end of a sentence indicate a continuation, but with the sentence structure you used it really was inappropriate. One period would have been sufficient.

quote:

---

Originally posted by silver-surfer:
.I think Wolf_larson should be heard here. No building in the entire united states is

---

In the first “LINE” of your post you made the following errors:

1. There is a period (.) before the first word.
2. Wolf_Larson spells his screen name with a capital W and capital L.
3. United States is capitalized.

I could rip the grammar and punctuation to shreds in your whole post, but I think you get the idea.

posted 06-21-2004 10:51 PM            

Words you managed to misspell during your rant listed below.

"indefensability"
"adminstrations"
"irrate"
"deliberatly"

And the best one, you even 'MISSPELLED' the word "mispelled".

Where exactly were you educated btw?

I don't usually pay much attention to these details since I make enough mistakes myself. But damn, who the hell are you to correct other people?

Are you familiar with what’s known as a “Speak & Spell”. With all sincerity, you might benefit from one.

posted 06-21-2004 10:55 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by KNOW-THIS:
Hey Jersey, LOL, you beat me to it!

---

Ha! LOL!!! I'm not surprised. You know what they say about like minds!

posted 06-21-2004 11:11 PM            

Do you know what a sycophant is? Have you looked in a mirror lately? Of course everyone makes grammatical errors... but misspelling the word definitely?? I mean it's obviousl you are just flattering that of the moderater to gain brownie points... we call this obesquious flattery.. of course I don't expect any of you to be able to read it, or spell it, or let alone comprehend it. ROFL.

posted 06-21-2004 11:32 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by silver-surfer:
Funny how you guys get your egocentric kicks out of correcting everyday forum lingo. There is no need to capitolize usernames or p.s.. This is a forum, not an english class... however when you misspell words such as definitely you are bound to eternal stupidity. Now, I guess no one is up to addressing the logical idealogy expressed within.. you're having too much fun hallucinating over words misspelled. Heh. So funny how such scrupulous conspiracy theorist fall right into my hands! Perhaps the hypocrisy should end and you should attempt to rebutt some valid and/or rhetorical claims. Of course I don't think anything any of you could say could simply mute me in regards to logic as I have you. It works every time. Now, whenever you righteous activist are ready to get back to reality i'm completely ready. Until then go ahead and make fals accusations and pick apart simple typological errors.

Do you know what a sycophant is? Have you looked in a mirror lately? Of course everyone makes grammatical errors... but misspelling the word definitely?? I mean it's obviousl you are just flattering that of the moderater to gain brownie points... we call this obesquious flattery.. of course I don't expect any of you to be able to read it, or spell it, or let alone comprehend it. ROFL.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by silver-surfer on 06-21-2004]

---

LOLOLOL!!!! You are hysterical! Thanks for the laugh.

posted 06-22-2004 12:30 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by silver-surfer:
Oh yeah, and Norrin Radd is an excellent photographer isn't he?

---

I've never seen any of his photographs so I wouldn't know. I sent Norrin Radd an email a few minutes ago - did you get it? What did I say?

posted 06-22-2004 12:32 AM            

And who are you calling a piece of shit, you filthy wad? No one cares about what you have to say because it's the same old rehashed boring garbage that's already been beaten into a bloody pulp time & time again. If you actually took the time to research the topic just on this site alone you'd realize that.

posted 06-22-2004 10:33 AM            

And remember Silver Surfer was never able to escape the earth's gravity because Galactus set up a shield to prevent leaving earth. You will eternally be under his control.

posted 06-22-2004 08:28 PM            

quote:

---

All that one needs to know, to be able to conclusively prove that the Twin Towers were demolished, is that the towers fell in roughly 10 seconds, that is, that they fell at about the same rate that an object falls through air.

---

400 metres : 9.0 seconds
500 metres : 10.1 seconds
600 metres : 11.1 seconds

So a one second error on the 10 second figure translates to an error of 100 metres.

Also, the towers were approximately 456 metres high. This fall would be achievable in ~9.6 seconds. (Less than the 10 that you quote.)

posted 06-22-2004 08:35 PM            

Now WHO is posing as someone else?

Typical contemptable de-bunker behavior.

My 3 guesses who this TROLL is.