Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Other Trails
  Chemtrail Deployed Stun Weapons

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   Chemtrail Deployed Stun Weapons

Topic page views:

billder
Senior Member

Hachita New Mexico USA
106 posts, Feb 2002

posted 06-18-2004 07:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for billder   Visit billder's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I feel quite sure this technology is being developed to depoly with sprayed auroras over crowds...the GUN misnomer is just a cover for their supposed SECRET technology....it not only can be done, it IS done already, this crowd stun technology, I mean...

From NEW SCIENTIST ...


Sweeping stun guns to target crowds

19:00 16 June 04

Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.

Weapons that can incapacitate crowds of people by sweeping a lightning-like beam
of electricity across them are being readied for sale to military and police
forces in the US and Europe.

At present, commercial stun guns target one person at a time, and work only at
close quarters. The new breed of non-lethal weapons can be used on many people
at once and operate over far greater distances.

But human rights groups are appalled by the fact that no independent safety
tests have been carried out, and by their potential for indiscriminate use.

Taser success rates by distance

The weapons are designed to address the perceived shortcomings of the Taser, the
electric-shock gun already used by 4000 police departments in the US and
undergoing trials with some police forces in the UK.

It hits the victim with two darts that trail current-carrying wires, which limit
its range to a maximum of seven metres (see graphic). As a single shot,
short-range weapon, the Taser is of little use in crowd control. And Tasers have
no effect on vehicles.

Ionised gas

These limitations are beginning to be overcome. Engineers working for the US
Department of Defense's research division, DARPA, and defence companies in
Europe have been working out how to create an electrically conductive path
between a gun and a target without using wires.

A weapon under development by Rheinmetall, based in Dorf, Germany, creates a
conducting channel by using a small explosive charge to squirt a stream of tiny
conductive fibres through the air at the victim (New Scientist print edition, 24
May 2003).

Meanwhile, Xtreme Alternative Defense Systems (XADS), based in Anderson,
Indiana, will be one of the first companies to market another type of wireless
weapon. Instead of using fibres, the $9000 Close Quarters Shock Rifle projects
an ionised gas, or plasma, towards the target, producing a conducting channel.
It will also interfere with electronic ignition systems and stop vehicles.

"We will be able to fire a stream of electricity like water out of a hose at one
or many targets in a single sweep," claims XADS president Peter Bitar.

Solid-state lasers

The gun has been designed for the US Marine Corps to use for crowd control and
security purposes and is due out in 2005. It is based on early, unwieldy
technology and has a range of only three metres, but an operator can debilitate
multiple targets by sweeping it across them for "as long as there is an input
power source," says Bitar.

XADS is also planning a more advanced weapon which it hopes will have a range of
100 metres or more. Instead of firing ionised gas, it will probably use a
powerful laser to ionise the air itself. The idea has been around for decades,
says LaVerne Schlie, a laser expert at the US Air Force Research Lab in
Kirtland, New Mexico. It has only become practical with advances in high-power
solid-state lasers.

"Before, it took a laser about the size of two trucks," says Schlie. "Now we can
do it with something that fits on a tabletop."

The laser pulse must be very intense, but can be brief. So the makers of the
weapons plan to use a UV laser to fire a 5-joule pulse lasting just 0.4
picoseconds - equating to a momentary power of more than 10 million megawatts.

This intense pulse - which is said not to harm the eyes - ionises the air,
producing long, thread-like filaments of glowing plasma that can be sustained by
repeating the pulse every few milliseconds. This plasma channel is then used to
deliver a shock to the victims similar to a Taser's 50,000-volt, 26-watt shock.

Instrument of torture

Subscribe to New Scientist for more news and features

Related Stories

Electric shock weapons could go wireless
21 May 2003

Non-lethal landmine zaps intruders with 50,000 volts
23 April 2003

United Airlines installs stun guns
16 November 2001

For more related stories
search the print edition Archive

Weblinks

Xtreme Alternative Defense Systems

HSV Technologies

DARPA

US Air force Research Lab

Taser International

HSV Technologies of San Diego, California is also working on stun and
vehicle-stopping shock weapons with ranges of over 100 metres. And another
company, Ionatron of Tuscon, Arizona, is due to supply a prototype wireless
vehicle-mounted weapon to the US Department of Defense by the end of 2004.

But the advent of wireless stun weapons has horrified human rights groups. Robin
Coupland of the Red Cross says they risk becoming a new instrument of torture.
And Brian Wood of Amnesty International says the long-range stun guns could
"inflict pain and other suffering on innocent bystanders".

And there are safety concerns. Of the 30,000 times US police officers have fired
Tasers, in 40 instances people stunned by them later died. The deaths have been
attributed to factors such as overdoses of drugs and alcohol, or fighting with
officers, rather than the electric shock.

In a statement, Taser International chief Rick Smith said: "In every single case
the medical examiner has attributed the direct cause of death to causes other
than the Taser." Amnesty is not convinced, however, and wants an independent
study of the effects of all existing and emerging electric-shock weapons.

David Hambling

------------------
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture, just get people to stop reading them. Bradbury

IP Logged

Thermit
Tech


Houston, TX
2713 posts, Jul 2000

posted 06-18-2004 11:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thermit   Visit Thermit's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
builder, moved thread to here from CT Science.

IP Logged

tachyon
New Member


35 posts, Jun 2004

posted 06-18-2004 09:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tachyon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
UPDATE:

This is called "biological Process Control" and is usually deployed by Helicopter.

It is listed as a non-lethal weapon by the Defense Technical Information Center. It was developed by the United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board some 7 years ago.



[Edited 1 times, lastly by tachyon on 06-18-2004]

IP Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c